Righteous
Assembly
Documenting and
Establishing the Clean Practices and Customs and Practices and Transmissions of
the real Righteous Assembly on the Earth
Josiahs Scott, Josiahs@trueconnection.org, www.TrueConnection.org
Other dates (as partly seen below); 2/8/17 (Re-compiled); 2/23/17
(added/recompiled: Denominations and
Church Groups); 3/11/17
These are unpublished personal notes for our community.
Like usual, in cases like this, you should contact us so that we can teach you all of these exciting and helpful things.
New
· Unity
Positivity
Conquers Your Issues
Negativity
does NOT Conquer Your Issues
Contents
10 People Needed to Have a
Synagogue?
I Will Build MY Called Out
Assembly
Elder/Overseer, Used Interchangeably
Elder/Overseer, Used Distinctively
Preachers Need To Be Sent By God
Matthew 23 -- Warnings Against
Unlawful Title-Exaltations
Ordinances – A – Communion / The Lord’s Supper /
Eucharist
Further Spiritual Applications
Against Leaven:
Take Clean Communion Seriously
Ordinances – C – Trine Immersion
Coming Out of the Immersion = Resurrection
Singular-tense Baptism Examples
Many People = the Greek Plural aspect
More Greek Details in the Bible
Not translated consistently in NT:
Idzo Does Not Require “Repeated” as much as
“Doing” Action
Crowning Each Other At Judgment
Synagoge, "chruch", etc.
-- Under Construction --
When was the Assembly Called Out, and what was it been called out of?
·
secular idea of assembly
·
from Heber to people becomming
eborites / Hebrews
Act_2:44-47; Act_20:20
(and compare 1Ti_5:13)
The assembly in their house:
Rom_16:5; 1Co_16:19; Col_4:15; Phm_1:2
and compare: Act_8:3
10-Person Minimum for
Assembly?
tags: 10 Person Minimum for
Assembly
3/18/16
Gen_18:32 KJV+ And he said,H559 OhH4994 let notH408 the LordH136 be angry,H2734 and I will speakH1696 yetH389 but this once:H6471 PeradventureH194 tenH6235 shall be foundH4672 there.H8033 And he said,H559 I will notH3808 destroyH7843 it for ten's sake.H5668 H6235
Gen_18:32 And he said, “Will there be anything against me, Lord, if I speak yet once more? But if there should be found there ten?” And He said, “I will not destroy it for the sake of the ten.”
Gen_18:32 καὶ εἶπεν
Μή τι, κύριε, ἐὰν
λαλήσω ἔτι ἅπαξ·
ἐὰν δὲ εὑρεθῶσιν
ἐκεῖ δέκα; καὶ
εἶπεν Οὐ μὴ ἀπολέσω
ἕνεκεν τῶν δέκα.
Gen_18:33 KJV+ And the LORDH3068 went his way,H1980 as soon asH834 he had leftH3615 communingH1696 withH413 Abraham:H85 and AbrahamH85 returnedH7725 unto his place.H4725
Gen_18:33 And the Lord departed, when He left off speaking to Abraham, and Abraham returned to his place.
Gen_18:33 ἀπῆλθεν
δὲ κύριος, ὡς ἐπαύσατο
λαλῶν τῷ
Αβρααμ, καὶ
Αβρααμ ἀπέστρεψεν
εἰς τὸν τόπον αὐτοῦ.
Acts: they met by the river to pray
-- Under Construction --
What is the role of
Deacons, Elders, Bishops etc.?
First, an elder is not the same as a deacon,
(as often disarranged in some churches). The very word “Deacon” in English is a
representation of “διάκονος” (diakonosG1247) in Greek, and is actually the word for servant (not “leader” per say), and comes
from another word that means “to run” – “διώκω” (diōkōG1377) and so
implies “to run errands” as a “servant.” At the same time, it is also an
officially recognized position in Jesus’ Church, and like the word Elder,
it must be interpreted specifically or generally with a close eye on context.
G1247 διακονέω
diakoneō dee-ak-on-eh'-o
From G1249; to be an attendant,
that is, wait upon (menially or as a host, friend or
[figuratively] teacher); technically to act as a Christian
deacon: - (ad-) minister (unto), serve, use the office of a deacon. (Strong’s)
It should be noted that, though servants
(deacons) have a position of service, we are strongly exhorted to submit to
such who serve fervently: see 1Co_16:15-16, where
“διακονιαν”G1248 (diakonian) is used, but is typically not
translated consistently as deacon, and because of this we might miss the
“official Church position” aspect of this verse.
Additionally: Despite the trouble of many self-professing
(so called) “conservatives,” the Scriptures are extremely clear (especially in
Greek) that Women can be Servants of the Church (Deaconesses).
So if a Deacon is to
serve, then what is an Elder?
The church term, “Presbyter” is simply a
transliteration (a Greek term represented with English letters, rather than a
translation of the term into English) of the Greek word for “elder”: “πρεσβύτερος” (presbuterosG4245). Elders are
to rule and or help rule in the Church (unlike servants, or “deacons,” who are
the official servants of the Church) and some Elders preach:
1Ti_5:17 MKJV Let the elders who rule well be
counted worthy of double honor, especially those who labor in Word and
doctrine.
2Jn_1:1
- John was one
1Pet_5:1
- Peter was one
Phm_1:9
(πρεσβυτης); 1Ti_4:14 → 2Ti_1:6 - Paul was one
Tit_1:5
- Paul had authority to appoint them
Heb_13:17 - We are commanded to submit to them (Also compare 1Pet_1:1, 5)
1Pet_5:2
- They are to feed the flock and take oversight
1Pet_5:1-4 - They are under-shepherds (“Pastors”) representing the Chief-Shepherd,
Jesus
Tit_1:5, 7 - They can be synonymous with “overseers” (“Bishops” from Greek; and
also see below)
They helped the Apostles rule the entire
early Church body:
Acts_15:2,
4, 6, 22, 23; 16:4
And for some deep spiritual correlation,
there are 24 of them in heaven:
Rev. 4:4, 10; 5:5, 6, 8, 11, 14; 7:11, 13;
11:16; 14:3; 19:4
Tit_1:5, 7; Act_20:17, 28; 1Pet_5:1-2 (where
“πρεσβυτερους” and
“επισκοπουντες”
are used)
I find no direct Biblical
reference to distinctions between an Elder and a Bishop, however,
it is indirectly understood that though every elder is a type of Bishop, (Tit_1:5, 7; Act_20:17, 28; 1Ti_5:17) not every Bishop is
properly an Elder. An example of this is where Titus, who was apparently
a younger man (Tit1:4), was delegated authority to appoint Elders (Tit_1:5). Titus would have been
considered at least a Bishop (if not an apostle) in such a position, but not an
“Elder.”
A more specific example
(though not more weighty) is that unanimous testimony of the early Church from
the very beginning. They also used the two terms interchangeably as the Bible
does, and they particularly specified The Bishops to be the primary leaders that were directly (and
successively) installed over the early Churches by the Apostles (as in 2Tim_2:2). This became an
extremely important issue to them as the Apostles eventually all died (mostly
by martyrdom). Through the succession of Bishops as their primary local leaders
(which many churches call “pastors” today) the early church zealously carried
on the authenticated authority, legacy and traditions from the Apostles, and
this is one of the primary means from which we got our New Testament –
preserved from the pollution of Heresy and handed to us in Truth, faithfulness
and purity. All Church leadership was important, but the primary common
denominator throughout the entire early Church was the Overseer (Bishop), who was
the essential (successive) link back to the Apostles, and their primary means
of legitimacy as a Church. Faithfulness and submission under each Overseer
meant obedience to the Apostles and their doctrine, and even, to the faith of
Christ Jesus, and the saving communion in the body of Christ.
All of this is to say that there were those
specific men appointed to oversee the church (which we often call “Pastors” or
“Bishops” in English), that were the primary overseers, and in addition to this
there were elders who also helped oversee under the main overseer in ruling the
church.
Act_20:28;
Phi_1:1; 1Tim_3:2;
Tit_1:7; 1Pe_2:25
Our English word Bishop was once
pronounced Bisceop in Old English, which is a little closer to the Greek
source word “ἐπίσκοπος” (episkoposG1985 –
“overseer”).
From Greek we have this definition:
G1985 ἐπίσκοπος episkopos ep-is'-kop-os
From G1909 and G4649 (in the sense of G1983);
a superintendent, that is, Christian officer in general charge of a (or the)
church (literally or figuratively): - bishop, overseer.
(Strong's)
The above
definition shows us that ἐπίσκοπος (episkopos) comes from two words, G1909 and G4649: “ἐπί ” (epi) and “σκοπός” (skopos) which would function as someone
who looks upon or over someone or something. So the term episkopos
most directly means overseer, and is applied and used throughout the New
Testament and Church History as the primary leader of a Church, who “looks
over” or “oversees” (and leads) a given congregation or group of congregations.
From this, terms like Episcopal and Episcopate are derived, but
the most common representation of this in English is Bishop.
Throughout the Greek Old Testament ἐπίσκοπος
(episkopos) is usually
originally used and applied as a term for keeping people accountable to their
actions. This word is often used as “looking upon” people for what they have
done in “a day of remembrance,” (and translators such as Brenton often
represent this word as “visiting” people in this way). So this word gets used
to speak of one who keeps people accountable for their actions as the one who
looks over (oversees) a person or people group.
This “overseeing” may be in the sense of
“visiting” the sins of people back upon their own head, (bringing judgment for
past sins) or for deliverance and reward, or it may simply speak of general
overseeing:
General
Oversight
Exo_30:12; Num_4:16; Num_7:2; Num_14:29;
Num_26:22; Num_26:43; Psa_109:8
General Judgment
Job_31:14; Job_34:9; Pro_29:13
Punishment
Lev_19:20; Num_16:29; Job_6:14; Job_7:18;
(Job_24:12); Isa_10:3; Isa_29:6; Jer_6:15; Jer_10:15; Eze_7:22; {Wis_3:13 (“the visitation of souls” = “oversight”
[ἐπισκοπῇ] of souls)}
Reward
Gen_50:24; Gen_50:25; Exo_3:16; Exo_13:19;
Job_10:12; Job_29:4; Isa_23:17; Isa_24:22;
Some peculiarities
are...
- In Num_4:16, the Priest is called (and
equated with) an Overseer.
- The Apostles understood this Old Testament
word to be directly and prophetically connected with the New Testament usage:
Psa_109:8; Act_1:16-26.
- In Act_1:20
the Apostles were referred to as holding the office of Overseers, (that
is, “ἐπισκοπὴν,” and see how it
is also used in 1Tim_3:1).
- In 1Pe_2:25,
Jesus is referred to as the Pastor
(ποιμένα) and Overseer (ἐπίσκοπον)
of our souls.
3/4/17; 3/14/17
-- Under Construction --
not appointed by fleshballs
they ran, but i did not send them...
rom10
for more, see: SPI
The term to Shepherd
from Hebrew basically means to feed and is often translated as such
throughout our English versions. In Greek the concept is applied in the same
sense, with at least the following verses indicating the “feeding” concept:
Jn 10:2-3, 9; Lk 17:7; 1 Cor_9:7; 1 Pet_9:2; Jude_1:12; Rev_7:17
The terms Pastor and Shepherd
(from Old French/Latin) found in our English Bible translations represent the
exact same word throughout the Old and New Testaments. The only real reason we
have so much of a distinction in English is because the term has been
creatively reapplied as a specific, primary word for a church office. It is
used at least 173 times in the Old Testament, and 18 times in the New
Testament. Both apply the term literally, to leaders of sheep, as well as
figuratively, to leaders of people, (Jer_3:15). The term was never intended, as it is so often used today, apart
from the “shepherd-over-the-sheep” analogy, and was used as a general term for
leaders, rather than a specific one for the primary leader of a
congregation. The variety of positions it is used for in the Bible is
referenced out below:
General use of shepherds: Mat_9:36
In
Joh_21:15-17 Peter was commanded to pastor/shepherd/ lit. "feed" [βόσκε (v. 15, 17)/ ποίμαινε (v. 16)] Jesus' lambs/ sheep [ἀρνία (v. 15)/ πρόβατά (v. 16, 17)].
In
1Pe_5:1-4 Peter commands elders/overseers to shepherd/ lit. “feed” [ποιμάνατε] God’s flock [ποίμνιον (v. 2)/ ποιμνίου
(v. 3)]
(just as he himself was commanded in Joh_21:16).
There are also the Elder/Overseer/Pastor
Verses: Act_20:17, 28; 1Pe_5:1-2 (where all 3 terms are applied to the same
group of leaders).
But more than any of these,
Jesus is highlighted as the head-Shepherd countless times:
Psa_23:1; 80:1; Isa_40:11; Eze_34:12, 34:23, 37:24; Mic_5:4; Zec_13:7; Mat_2:6; Jn 10:11-16; Heb_13:20; 1Pe_2:25 (where Jesus is also
called an Overseer); 5:4.
Just because the word pastor
has been adapted in its use as an English term does not mean that there is
something wrong with the way we use it today, but it may be helpful to
be sensitive to the fact that it no longer implies the same meanings as the
Biblical usage. At the same time there is nothing particularly inspired about
its use nor its origin, since it is considerably clear that the term Pastor
was significantly popularized as a primary title for the Overseer (or his
representative over a church) by the protestants, and especially John Calvin,
who was reacting against Catholic terminology, just as they did from having
“sacraments” to “ordnances.”
In short, the term shepherd
is a very general term used in Scripture for leadership, covering a wide range
of offices from Overseer and Elder to Apostle and even to Jesus Himself. The
word Shepherd, now often represented as “Pastor,” has come to be used as
something quite specific, especially as a primary church office among most all
non-liturgical churches.
Silly (Protestant) church people love to deny that the New Testament has priests:
“the New Testament does not teach that there are to be priests in the New Covenant.”
https://www.gotquestions.org/confession-sin-priest.html
4/16/17
Psa_132:16 WEB Her
priests I will also clothe with salvation. Her saints will shout aloud for joy.
Psa_132:16 KJV+ I will also clotheH3847 her priestsH3548 with salvation:H3468 and her saintsH2623 shall shout aloud for joy.H7442 H7442
Psa_132:16 LB I will clothe her priests with salvation; and her saints shall greatly rejoice.
Psa_132:16 (131:16) τοὺς ἱερεῖς
αὐτῆς ἐνδύσω
σωτηρίαν, καὶ οἱ
ὅσιοι αὐτῆς ἀγαλλιάσει
ἀγαλλιάσονται·
Psa_132:17 WEB
There I will make the horn of David to bud. I have ordained a lamp for
my anointed.
Psa_132:17 KJV+ ThereH8033 will I make the hornH7161 of DavidH1732 to bud:H6779 I have ordainedH6186 a lampH5216 for mine anointed.H4899
Psa_132:17 LB There will I cause to spring up a horn to David: I have prepared a lamp for My Anointed.
Psa_132:17 (131:17) ἐκεῖ ἐξανατελῶ
κέρας τῷ Δαυιδ, ἡτοίμασα
λύχνον τῷ
χριστῷ μου·
Surprisingly (to
Protestants) there are actually direct New Testament verses conveying priestly
(and Levitical) attributes to Church leaders. One may ascertain, as the early
Church would unanimously insist, that such Church positions (or callings)
make one spiritually part of the tribe of Levi. However at the same time we
must also confidently insist that there is no mention of a New Testament Priest
as used by the catholic church anywhere in the entire Bible. Jesus is the High
Priest1 of our faith, and only mediator, and we who follow Him are
all to be a kingdom of priests2:
(1) Heb_2:17; 3:1; 4:14, 15; 5: 5,
10; 6:20; 7:1, 26; 8:1; 9: 11, 25; 10:19-22; One mediator: 1Ti_2:5
(2) Rom_12:1; Phi_4:18; Heb_13:16; 1Pet_2:5, 9; Rev_1:6; 5:10; 20:6
Catholics may appeal to the many
examples in Church history that might seem to support their practice and titles
(especially in post-apostasy church history), but even the early Church
conducted such terminology with a different meaning, fully supporting this
“kingdom of priests2”. (Note: Usually Protestants less accurately
call this “The Priesthood of all Believers”.) Only in a particular since did they refer to Church leaders as priests, as
the Scriptures also agree:
·
1Co_9:13-14 KJV Do ye not know
that they which minister about holy things live of the things of the
temple? and they which wait at the altar are partakers with the altar? 14 Even
so hath the Lord ordained that they which preach the gospel should live of the
gospel.
Rom_15:16 KJV That I should be
the minister3011 (λειτουργον) of Jesus Christ to the
Gentiles, ministering2418 (ιερουργουντα) the gospel of God, that the
offering up of the Gentiles might be acceptable, being sanctified by the Holy
Ghost.
·
The terminology “offering up” refers to the
imagery of a priestly sacrifice, (As in Exo. 29:27; Num_15:19-20; 18:26; 2 Sam_24:22; 1 King_3:15).
·
I included the Greek words above because most
all translations somewhat smooth over some interesting and key insights into
the Greek. Notice the qualities below that Strong's and an effective
understanding of the Greek draws out in the definitions of the two words used
in this verse:
Some Greek Insights from Rom_15:16:
“G3011 λειτουργός
leitourgos li-toorg-os' From a derivative of G2992 and G2041; a public servant, that is, a functionary in the Temple or Gospel, or (generally) a worshipper (of God) or benefactor (of man): - minister (-ed),” (Strong's). More Details: This first word in question used in Rom_15:16, “minister3011” (λειτουργον), is where we get our word for “liturgy” from. When a minister (λειτουργός) ministers, this is called “λειτουργέω” in Greek (G3008), and is also commonly used with the Priestly context in the Greek Old Testament quite a few times: Num_3:31; Num_4:9; Num_4:12; Num_4:14; Num_4:26; Num_18:21; 2Ki_25:14; 1Ch_6:32; 1Ch_16:4; 2Ch_13:10; 2Ch_23:6; 2Ch_29:11; Ezr_7:24; Neh_10:36; Neh_10:39; Isa_61:6; Eze_42:14; Eze_44:11; Eze_44:19; Eze_45:4; Eze_45:5; Eze_46:24; Joe_1:9; Joe_1:13; Joe_2:17 -- (25 verses) [The times used without a priestly context in the
Greek Old Testament are these: 1Ki_1:15; 1Ch_27:1; 2Ch_15:16; 2Ch_17:19; 2Ch_22:8;
Psa_103:21; Psa_104:4 – (7 verses)] And this “ministering”
word occurs 3 times in the New Testament, and is once used with a literal
Priestly context, while the other two are naturally referring to New
Testament ministering: Act_13:2; Rom_15:27; Heb_10:11; This main word for minister (G3011) is used five
times in the New testament, and twice* this word is used with Priestly references: Rom_13:6; *Rom_15:16; Phi_2:25; Heb_1:7; *Heb_8:2 |
“G2418 ἱερουργέω
hierourgeō hee-er-oorg-eh'-o From a compound of G2411 and the base of G2041; to be a temple worker, that is, officiate as a priest (figuratively): - minister,” (Strong's). More Details: This second word in question used in Rom_15:16,
“ministering2418”
[ιερουργουντα],
is a compound of the word “Temple” (ἱερόν -
G2411) and work (ἔργον - G2041). It is not used in the Greek Septuagint, but only in
the New Testament |
So we see in Rom_15:16, that Paul uses two
“Priestly” words as well as using the priestly image of “offering up” to
describe himself and his work as a leader in the Church.
Unfortunately, the early
Church emphasized this more and more, and when serious corruption and
full-fledged apostasy set in, they naturally emphasized it into unbiblical
proportions as we can see it commonly used today.
9/16/05
The Command
Tit_1:5-7 ALT On account of this I left you in Crete, so that you should set in order the things lacking and appoint [or, set up] elders4245 [Gr. prebuteros] in every city, as I commanded you. 6 If anyone is beyond reproach, [the] husband435 of one3391 wife1135 [or, a one-wife kind of man]… 7 For it is necessary [for] the overseer1985 [Gr. episkope] to be beyond reproach, as God's steward…
1Ti_3:2 ALT Therefore, it is necessary [for] the overseer 1985 to be blameless [or, above reproach], [the] husband435 of one3391 wife1135 [or, a one-wife kind of man], temperate, self-controlled, sensible, a friend of strangers [or, hospitable], skillful at teaching,
Translations have traditionally followed the rendering, “the husband of one wife,” with these two passages because it is the easiest way to represent the wording into English, not because it is the most accurate way to do so. Let us now be put in mind that the bracketed rendering that the Analytical-Literal Translation gives us here is truer to the actual wording and intent of the original language than the traditional rendering.
The Actual Greek reads like this:
“μιας3391 γυναικος1135 ανδρα435” (1Tim_3:2 GNT-TR+)
If you will notice by matching up the Strong’s numbers between the English and the Greek texts that I have given you here, you can plainly see the order of the words has been changed in English, as it is typically done in translation. In this case, the most literal rendering is a “one-woman man.” The way that we know that the Greek word “γυναικος1135” is referring to a wife here and not just a woman, is simply because of context. Note the implications of the small degree of misrepresentation with these passages. Any sailor knows that being a small degree off-course can result in a totally different destination, and this slight misrepresentation has lead many to Biblically deviant conclusions.
One can be a specific “type” of person without presently being involved in the total fulfillment of such a category. For example, I am a “Heterosexual” even though I am not engaging in any sexual behavior at this point in my life. If I marry someone, it will be someone of the opposite sex, and so I would “prove” or “fulfil” my heterosexuality in this way. If I were a eunuch I would not be able to claim that I was a “heterosexual,” nor would I be able to properly “prove” or “fulfil” it. So also, saying a “one-woman man” is comparable to saying “a heterosexual man.” Both terms refer to a male that may or may not be married. The only difference is that a “one-woman man” refers to a type of heterosexual who refuses to have more than one wife. Given the radical, overriding teaching of the church (particularly at this time period) it is obvious what this scripture is referring to more than anything: “Everyone putting away his wife and marrying another commits adultery; and everyone marrying her who is put away from her husband commits adultery, (Luk_16:18 MKJV).”
So we see that the actual, literal command is not what we may have though it was, as it has been traditionally misrepresented to us in a small degree, and has destined some to the wrong conclusions. We have also seen that this scripture calls for a specific “type” of person, more so than outlining his living circumstances.
If we will develop a doctrine based upon one questionable interpretation of an English misrepresentation of Scripture, then we are to be pitied. Let us rather dig deeper, and assure ourselves in Scripture, and not in misunderstandings.
The Rest Of The Story
If we are to conclude upon a doctrine, it is necessary to do so considering the entire body of Scripture. Let us not hang our hat on one verse, and forget to double-check our conclusions with other scriptures that sometimes deal more clearly with the same subject matter.
We see the same principal of purity at work in this scripture:
Do not let a widow be enrolled having become less than sixty years old, the wife of one man, 10 well reported of for good works: if she brought up children, if she lodged strangers, if she washed the feet of saints, if she relieved the afflicted, if she followed after every good work. (1Ti_5:9-10 MKJV)
Again, the literal rendering is if she has been a “one-man woman” ( “ενος1520 ανδρος435 γυνη1135 , (1Ti_5:9 GNT-TR+)”). We should be honest and admit that the principal behind both commands is to recognize the sin of maintaining more than one marriage. If she had been loosed from one marriage covenant by death, and then had later taken another husband, she would have never ceased to be a “one-man woman.”
Rom_7:2-3 MKJV For the married woman was bound by law to the living husband. But if the husband is dead, she is set free from the law of her husband. 3 So then if, while her husband lives, she is married to another man, she shall be called an adulteress. But if the husband dies, she is free from the law, so that she is no adulteress by becoming another man's wife.
The command in 1Ti_5:9-10 then, is that she not have been an adulteress.
We see that the principal of the “one-spouse” commands is not bound with in the living circumstance of the person in question, but is transcending to the character of a person whether or not their character is presently being proven.
More About “Elders”
Elders rule in the Church (unlike Deacons who are servants of the Church) and some preach:
1Ti_5:17 MKJV Let the elders who rule well be counted worthy of double honor, especially those who labor in Word and doctrine.
2Jn_1:1 John was one
1Pet_5:1 Peter was one
Phm_1:9 Paul
was “aged” (Apostleship + Age = “An elder” if nothing else)
Paul
had authority to appoint them
1Pet_5:2 They are to feed the flock and take oversight
1Pet_5:1-4 They
are under-shepherds representing the Chief-Shepherd Jesus (who was not married)
Rev. 4:4, 10; 5:5, 6, 8, 11, 14; 7:11,
13; 11:16; 14:3; 19:4: There are 24 of
them in heaven
Tit_1:5, 7 They
can be synonymies with “overseers”
More About Overseers
Act_20:27-29 Paul
associated his work with theirs
1Pet_2:25 Jesus is the ultimate overseer (and He was not married)
Both
1Tim_3:1-7; Tit_1:5-11: Paul had
authority to say what they should look like
Since Jesus is the ultimate
Overseer (1Pet_2:25);
and seeing that that term can be synonymies with “elder” (Tit_1:5,7); and seeing that elders
represent Jesus as under-shepherds (1Pet_5:4); and seeing that Jesus is old (eg. Jn
1:1); and seeing that Jesus is called our
and seeing that Jesus seems to
consistently bear every honorable title that we could otherwise possibly gain
via “Spiritual Gifting,” or spiritual standing before God such as “King,”
“Apostle,” and “Priest” (compare 1Tim_3:16; Heb_3:1; Rev_17:14; 19:16
with 1Cor_12:28-31 and Rev_1:6; 5:10) “Prophet” (compare Deu_18:18-22; Mat_13:57/Mar_6:4/Jn 4:44; Mat_21:11; Lk 24:19;
Act_3:22-23; 7:37
with Act_13:1; 15:32; 21:10; 1Cor_12:28-29; 14:29-32, 37; Eph_3:5; 4:11; Rev_16:6; 18:20;
22:9);
It is only reasonable to say that Jesus is also the ultimate “Elder.”
Strong’s Definitions
Elders
G4245 πρεσβύτερος presbuteros pres-boo'-ter-os
Comparative of πρέσβυς presbus (elderly); older; as noun, a senior; specifically an Israelite Sanhedrist (also figuratively, member of the celestial council) or Christian “presbyter”: - elder (-est), old.
Overseer
G1985 ἐπίσκοπος episkopos ep-is'-kop-os
From G1909 and G4649 (in the sense of G1983); a superintendent, that is, Christian officer in general charge of a (or the) church (literally or figuratively): - bishop, overseer.
“Husband”
G435 ἀνήρ anēr an'-ayr
A primary word (compare G444); a man (properly as an individual male): - fellow, husband, man, sir.
“Wife”
G1135 γυνή gunē goo-nay'
Probably from the base of G1096; a woman; specifically a wife: - wife, woman.
ὀρέγομαι
ἐπισκοπή
ἐπιθυμέω
καλός
So from all of this we can
clarify the distinctions between Church leaders:
The Overseer (or “Bishop”) of a
given Church was only one person (of critical importance), whereas the Elders
constituted a more varied pool of leadership who also served as overseers. At
times in church history there is talk of deacons serving in leadership, but
never in insubordination to the Overseer. This is a solid understanding in the
early Church that complements and in many ways fills in the details of what the
Bible so often refers to.
Although the use of the term
Pastor and the usage of priestly descriptions were applied to Church
leadership in the Bible as well as carried over into the vocabulary of the
Early Church, both have been adapted into terms inconsistent with the Biblical
usage. While we may find the use of the term Pastor to be convenient, we
should not find the contemporary use of the term Priest (with its
exclusive connotations) to be acceptable in describing Church leadership.
In all of this basic
framework addressing church government, we still have not addressed the most
crucial aspect of Church leadership, which is based on Spiritual gifts. The
highest order of leadership in the Church, apostleship, cannot even be
accomplished by the structure we set up. If we accomplished all these framework
specifics of leadership without the life of Spiritual Gifting included, we've
failed our mission and accomplish nothing. Let us both set up the frame work
accurately as well as give it living wings to fly.
Also Compare: Gifts of the Holy Spirit; [Back to Contents]
12/21/17; 1/10/18
the lot was last used right before the monotheistic Spirit fell
>> do some leadership positions and words imply that a lot is
still involved?
Tit1:5 -- Stand Down / establish Elders in every city
>Tsk!!!
Act14:23 -- hand stretched / picked Elders for each assembly
2co8:19 -- handpicked glorious one to travel with donations
the Jews cast Pebbles
>tsk
>>> Are lots used to describe positions of leadership?
Democracy &
voting?
2co8:19 -- hand picked
>Tsk
> Sync: RAS | Mark
How Much to Honor
People with “Titles”
2/21/17 (recompiled); 3/11/17
-- Under Construction --
One of the main passages that warns us against the bad use of titles, especially in the new covenant.
-- Under Construction --
8/2/14; 9/6/16; 2/21/17
(recompiled); 3/12/17
1Sa_1:15 WEB Hannah answered, No, my lord, I am a woman of a sorrowful spirit: I have drunk neither wine nor strong drink, but I poured out my soul before Yahweh.
1Sa_1:15 LB And Hannah answered and said, “No my lord, I live in a hard day, and I have not drunk wine or strong drink, and I pour out my soul before the Lord.
1Sa_1:15 ? And Anna answered and said, Nay, my lord,
I live in a hard day, and I have not drunk wine or strong drink, and I pour out
my soul before the Lord.
1Sa_1:15 καὶ ἀπεκρίθη
Αννα καὶ εἶπεν
Οὐχί, κύριε·
γυνή, ᾗ σκληρὰ ἡμέρα,
ἐγώ εἰμι καὶ οἶνον
καὶ μέθυσμα οὐ
πέπωκα καὶ ἐκχέω
τὴν ψυχήν μου ἐνώπιον
κυρίου·
1Sa_1:26 WEB She said, Oh, my lord, as your soul lives, my lord, I am the woman who stood by you here, praying to Yahweh.
1Sa_1:26 LB And she said, “I pray, my lord, as your soul lives, I am the woman that stood in your presence with you while praying to the Lord.
1Sa_1:26 καὶ εἶπεν
Ἐν ἐμοί, κύριε·
ζῇ ἡ ψυχή σου, ἐγὼ
ἡ γυνὴ ἡ καταστᾶσα
ἐνώπιόν σου ἐν
τῷ προσεύξασθαι
πρὸς κύριον·
2Ki_4:15-17 WEB He said, Call her. When he had called her, she stood in the door. 16 He said, At this season, when the time comes round, you shall embrace a son. She said, No, my lord, you man of God, do not lie to your handmaid. 17 The woman conceived, and bore a son at that season, when the time came round, as Elisha had said to her.
2Ki_4:15-17 CAB And he called her, and she stood by the door. 16 And Elisha said to her, At this time next year, as the season is, you shall be alive, and embrace a son. And she said, No, my lord [κύριέ μου], do not lie to your servant. 17 And the woman conceived, and bore a son at the very time, as the season was, being alive, as Elisha said to her.
2Ki_4:15-17 Greek
καὶ ἐκάλεσεν
αὐτήν, καὶ ἔστη
παρὰ τὴν θύραν. 16
καὶ εἶπεν
Ελισαιε πρὸς αὐτήν
Εἰς τὸν καιρὸν
τοῦτον ὡς ἡ ὥρα
ζῶσα σὺ
περιειληφυῖα
υἱόν· ἡ δὲ εἶπεν
Μή, κύριέ μου, μὴ
διαψεύσῃ τὴν
δούλην σου. 17
καὶ ἐν γαστρὶ ἔλαβεν
ἡ γυνὴ καὶ ἔτεκεν
υἱὸν εἰς τὸν
καιρὸν τοῦτον ὡς
ἡ ὥρα ζῶσα, ὡς ἐλάλησεν
πρὸς αὐτὴν
Ελισαιε. --
Psa/Gospels - The Lord said to my Lord...
Luk_1:43 - the mother of my Lord
Joh_20:1 - "Mary Magdalene"
\/
Joh_20:2 "the Lord" [τὸν Κύριον]
\/
Joh_20:11-12 - "two angels"
\/
Joh_20:13 - "my Lord" [τὸν Κύριόν μου]
\/
Joh_20:14-17 - Jesus
\/
Joh_20:15 - supposing Him to be the gardener..."Sir [κύριε]
\/
Joh_20:18 - the Lord [τὸν Κύριον]
Other dates; 2/20/17 (recompiled/added: Important Communion Passages); 1/13/23
1Co_11:23-26; Mar_14:22-25; Mat_26:26-29; Luk_22:14-20
Concerning the Ordinances (or Sacraments?) of the Church in
general, it should be clear to all that they are not optional, but rather, they
are commands.
It is necessary for following Jesus: Jn 6:53-66 (also see verses 26-69); Mat_26:26-29.
It defined the early Church (Act_2:42). Ideally, it would be done every day from house to house:
“And they, continuing daily with one accord in the temple, and breaking bread from house to house, did eat their meat [food] with gladness and singleness of heart, (Act_2:46 KJV).”
In addition to this, it should be done among “the Great Assembly” when all her members meet together in one place (Act_20:7; 1Cor_11:18-31).
There’s no question that communion should be open to all real disciples, _5:23-24; 1Cor_11:17-34)
but it makes no Biblical since to turn it into a meaningless religious ceremony by encouraging lost attendees to participate as well. Communion is a serious thing that should be practiced frequently with fear and trembling (See Mat7/5/20
Self-identifying pagans like to point out that pagans were supposedly eating “bread as the flesh” of their god before the NT, but both of these practices were preceded by the common understanding of flesh as bread.
Psa_14:4 WEB Have all the workers of
iniquity no knowledge, who eat up my people as they eat bread, and don't call
on Yahweh?
Psa_14:4 Will not all the
workers of iniquity know, who eat up my people as they would eat bread? They
have not called upon the Lord.
Psa_14:4 (13:4) οὐχὶ γνώσονται πάντες οἱ ἐργαζόμενοι τὴν ἀνομίαν; οἱ κατεσθίοντες τὸν λαόν μου βρώσει ἄρτου τὸν κύριον οὐκ ἐπεκαλέσαντο.
Joseph in prison
10/8/07
Luk_22:15-21 WEB He said to them, "I have earnestly desired1939 [επιθυμια] to eat this Passover with you before I suffer, 16 for I tell you, I will no longer by any means eat of it until it is fulfilled in the Kingdom of God." 17 He received a cup, and when he had given thanks, he said, "Take this, and share it among yourselves, 18 for I tell you, I will not drink at all again from the fruit of the vine, until the Kingdom of God comes." 19 He took bread, and when he had given thanks, he broke it, and gave to them, saying, "This is my body which is given for you. Do this in memory of me." 20 Likewise, he took the cup after supper, saying, "This cup is the new covenant in my blood, which is poured out for you. 21 But behold, the hand of him who betrays me is with me on the table.
-
The word for desired1939
in “"I have earnestly desired1939”
is επιθυμια (epithumía) and is usually used as
“lust”
-
The event of giving the cup of communion is first
stated (in verses 17-18) and then revisited with more detail (in verse 20)
-
“…the fruit of the vine…” Although this was certainly wine,
Jesus symbolism did not include “fermentation”; although it is comparatively
unusual to use grape juice, it does not depart from the commands of Jesus. How
do I know this for sure? I’m glad you ask:
-
Communion is necessary for following Jesus: Jn 6:53-66
(also see verses 26-69); Mat_26:26-29.
- Rom_14:21 WEB It is good to not eat meat, drink wine [πιεῖν οἶνον], nor do anything by which your brother stumbles, is offended, or is made weak.
- At the same time, Drinking wine is defiantly not bad when no one sees it at sinful:
1Ti_4:4 – Everything is good with thanksgiving
1Tim_5:23 – Timothy commanded to drink wine
Eph_5:18 – It says, “No Drunkenness” not, “No Drink”
Joh_2:3-11 – Jesus turned the water into “good wine” vs. inferior wine (v. 10)
Luk_5:39 – It is the “Old wine” (more fermented) that tastes better than “the new” (unfermented).
Act_2:13 – Neither of these should be confused with “Sweet wine”: “γλευκους” pronounced as “Gleukous” where we get “Glucose” from, which basically means “sugar”. This verse is sometimes mistranslated as “new wine” as though it could get you drunk.
Mat_26:26-30 KJV And as they were eating, Jesus took bread, and blessed it, and brake it, and gave it to the disciples, and said, Take, eat; this is my body. 27 And he took the cup, and gave thanks, and gave it to them, saying, Drink ye all of it;* 28 For this is my blood of the new testament, which is shed for many for the remission of sins. 29 But I say unto you, I will not drink henceforth of this fruit of the vine, until that day when I drink it new with you in my Father's kingdom. 30 And when they had sung an hymn, they went out into the mount of Olives.
*πίετε ἐξ αὐτοῦ πάντες·
Literally:
Drink out of it all
Or given the nature of Greek:
All of it drink out
But Protestants with an anti-Catholic agenda have said that “αὐτοῦ” refers to the Apostles all drinking.
It is singular, not plural: πιετεG4095V-2AAM-2P πίνω to imbibe εξG1537PREP ἐκ from αυτουG846P-GSN αὐτός he, she, it παντεςG3956A-NPM πᾶς all
The cultural significance of Betrothal language in Jesus’ Words outweighs and disproves this Protestant defense mechanism.
Furthermore, “αὐτοῦ” clearly refers to the cup in the below example with the same words used…
Mar_14:22-26 KJV And as they did eat, Jesus took bread, and blessed, and brake it, and gave to them, and said, Take, eat: this is my body. 23 And he took the cup, and when he had given thanks, he gave it to them: and they all drank of it*. 24 And he said unto them, This is my blood of the new testament, which is shed for many. 25 Verily I say unto you, I will drink no more of the fruit of the vine, until that day that I drink it new in the kingdom of God. 26 And when they had sung an hymn, they went out into the mount of Olives.
*καὶ
ἔπιον ἐξ αὐτοῦ πάντες
Lit. “and they drank of it all”
Although this is not typically translated this way, the words are the same as Jesus’ command. By itself, “all” here could refer to the disciples or the cup, but contextually it looks to me like it refers to the cup.
Of the Passover food God says similarly:
Num_9:12 WEB They shall leave none of it until the morning…
1Co_10:16-17 KJV The cup of blessing which we bless, is it not the communion of the blood of Christ? The bread which we break, is it not the communion of the body of Christ? 17 For we being many are one bread, and one body: for we are all partakers of that one bread.
Background:
“The
third cup is the Kos B'rakhah, the Cup of Blessing (also called the Cup
of Redemption), which we drink as we conclude the Birkat Hamazon, the
Grace After Meals referenced above. It is drunk during the section of the seder
known as Barekh, which means, "Blessing."”
[http://bethimmanuel.org/passover/a-this.html]
“Jews
blessed, or gave thanks for their wine, as well as for their food, and
generally did it in this form (w):
"Blessed art thou, O Lord, our God, the king of the world, who
hast created the "fruit of the vine".”
(Gill)
Unleavened in the OT
passover
Wiki: “unleavened bread for Gideon; kid and vegetable offering for Manoach”
\/
Luke_24:28-35
The Point: Communion reveals “the angel of the Lord”
Malachi: “from the rising of the sun even unto the going down of the same my name shall be great among the Gentiles”
Of Church discipline Paul says
1Co_5:6-8 EMTV Your boasting is not good. Do you not know that a little leaven leavens the whole batch? 7 Purge out the old leaven, in order that you may be a new batch of dough, since you are unleavened. For indeed Christ, our Passover, was sacrificed for us. 8 So then let us observe the feast, not with old leaven, nor with the leaven of malice and wickedness, but with the unleavened bread of sincerity and truth.
This speaks of their (New Covenant) observance of Passover, and potentially by reapplication, for their frequent observance of communion.
Exo_12:7-8 WEB They shall take some of the blood, and put it on the two side-posts and on the lintel, on the houses in which they shall eat it. 8 They shall eat the flesh in that night, roasted with fire, and unleavened bread. They shall eat it with bitter herbs.
Exo_13:3 WEB Moses said to the people, "Remember this day, in which you came out from Egypt… No leavened bread shall be eaten.
Exo_13:5-7 WEB …you shall keep this service in this month. 6 Seven days you shall eat unleavened bread, and in the seventh day shall be a feast to Yahweh. 7 Unleavened bread shall be eaten throughout the seven days; and no leavened bread shall be seen with you, neither shall there be yeast seen with you, in all your borders.
[i.e. “7 Purge out the old leaven…” (1Co_5:6-8 EMTV).]
Num_9:12-13 WEB They shall leave none of it until the morning, nor break a bone of it. According to all the statute of the Passover they shall keep it. 13 But the man who is clean, and is not on a journey, and fails to keep the Passover, that soul shall be cut off from his people. Because he didn't offer the offering of Yahweh in its appointed season, that man shall bear his sin.
Deu_16:3 WEB You shall eat no leavened bread with it; seven days shall you eat unleavened bread therewith, even the bread of affliction; for you came forth out of the land of Egypt in haste…
“Matza (also Matzo, Matzah Hebrew מַצָּה ) is a cracker-like bread made of plain flour and water. The dough is pricked in several places and not allowed to rise before baking, thereby producing a hard, flat bread.”
[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matzo]
The “pricked”
bread is not commanded in the Bible, but is one of many culturally prophetic
things that God has caused the Jews to do to this day to speak of Jesus’
pierced body.
Mat_16:5-11 KJVCNT And when his disciples had come to the other side, they had forgotten to take bread. 6 Then Jesus said unto them, Take heed and beware of the leaven of the Pharisees and of the Sadducees. 7 And they reasoned among themselves, saying, It is because we have taken no bread. 8 Which when Jesus perceived, he said unto them, O you of little faith, why reason you among yourselves, because you have brought no bread? 9 Do you not yet understand, neither remember the five loaves of the five thousand, and how many baskets you took up? 10 Neither the seven loaves of the four thousand, and how many baskets you took up? 11 How is it that you do not understand that I spoke it not to you concerning bread, but that you should beware of the leaven of the Pharisees and of the Sadducees?
Also see:
Mar_8:14-21 – “…and of the leaven of Herod” Also mentions hard heart, blind eyes and deaf ears
Luk_12:1 EMTV …He began to say to His disciples first of all, "Beware of the leaven of the Pharisees, which is hypocrisy.
[Notice He does not say, “Legalism”]
Gal_5:9 KJVCNT A little leaven leavens the whole lump.
1Co_11:23-34 WEB For I received from the Lord that which also I delivered to you, that the Lord Jesus on the night in which he was betrayed took bread. 24 When he had given thanks, he broke it, and said, "Take, eat. This is my body, which is broken for you. Do this in memory of me." 25 In the same way he also took the cup, after supper, saying, "This cup is the new covenant in my blood. Do this, as often as you drink, in memory of me." 26 For as often as you eat this bread and drink this cup, you proclaim the Lord's death until he comes. 27 Therefore whoever eats this bread or drinks the Lord's cup in a manner unworthy of the Lord will be guilty of the body and the blood of the Lord. 28 But let a man examine himself, and so let him eat of the bread, and drink of the cup. 29 For he who eats and drinks in an unworthy manner eats and drinks judgment to himself, if he doesn't discern the Lord's body. 30 For this cause many among you are weak and sickly, and not a few sleep. 31 For if we discerned ourselves, we wouldn't be judged. 32 But when we are judged, we are punished by the Lord, that we may not be condemned with the world. 33 Therefore, my brothers, when you come together to eat, wait one for another. 34 But if anyone is hungry, let him eat at home, lest your coming together be for judgment. The rest I will set in order whenever I come.
---
“Gill” herein refers to:
John Gill's Exposition of the Entire Bible
Dr. John Gill (1690-1771)
6/3/17; 1/13/23
Paul said that some of the Corinthians died because they didn’t take communion in unworthy way and distinguish those who were real disciples as Jesus’ body.
Notice that people are not usually dying these days for taking their own communions in very unworthy ways.
Obviously communion belongs to Jesus’ Righteous Assembly, and it is the holy ones who do righteousness who must take real clean communions seriously.
If you are defiled, the point is not to avoid communion
You got to find a way to have your sins forgiven, and have life in yourself!
Num_9:6 WEB There were certain men, who were unclean because of the dead body of a man, so that they could not keep the Passover on that day, and they came before Moses and before Aaron on that day.
Num_9:6 LB And there came men who were unclean by reason of a dead body, and they were not able to keep the Passover on that day; and they came before Moses and Aaron on that day.
Num_9:6 Καὶ
παρεγένοντο οἱ
ἄνδρες, οἳ ἦσαν ἀκάθαρτοι
ἐπὶ ψυχῇ ἀνθρώπου
καὶ οὐκ ἠδύναντο
ποιῆσαι τὸ
πασχα ἐν τῇ ἡμέρᾳ
ἐκείνῃ, καὶ
προσῆλθον ἐναντίον
Μωυσῆ καὶ
Ααρων ἐν ἐκείνῃ
τῇ ἡμέρᾳ,
Num_9:7 WEB Those men said to him, "We are unclean because of the dead body of a man. Why are we kept back, that we may not offer the offering of Yahweh in its appointed season among the children of Israel?"
Num_9:7 And those men said to Moses, “We are unclean by reason of the dead body of a man: shall we therefore fail to offer the gift to the Lord in its season in the midst of the children of Israel?”
Num_9:7 καὶ εἶπαν
οἱ ἄνδρες ἐκεῖνοι
πρὸς αὐτόν Ἡμεῖς
ἀκάθαρτοι ἐπὶ
ψυχῇ ἀνθρώπου·
μὴ οὖν ὑστερήσωμεν
προσενέγκαι τὸ
δῶρον κυρίῳ
κατὰ καιρὸν αὐτοῦ
ἐν μέσῳ υἱῶν
Ισραηλ;
Num_9:8 WEB Moses answered them, "Wait, that I may hear what Yahweh will command concerning you."
Num_9:8 And Moses said to them, “Stand there, and I will hear what command the Lord will give concerning you.”
Num_9:8 καὶ εἶπεν
πρὸς αὐτοὺς
Μωυσῆς Στῆτε αὐτοῦ,
καὶ ἀκούσομαι,
τί ἐντελεῖται
κύριος περὶ ὑμῶν.
--
Num_9:9 WEB Yahweh spoke to Moses, saying,
Num_9:9 And the Lord spoke to Moses, saying,
Num_9:9 καὶ ἐλάλησεν
κύριος πρὸς
Μωυσῆν λέγων
Num_9:10 WEB "Say to the children of Israel, 'If any man of you or of your generations is unclean by reason of a dead body, or is on a journey far away, he shall still keep the Passover to Yahweh.
Num_9:10 “Speak to the children of Israel, saying, ‘Whatever man shall be unclean by reason of a dead body, or on a journey far off, among you, or among your posterity; he shall then keep the Passover to the Lord,
Num_9:10 Λάλησον
τοῖς υἱοῖς
Ισραηλ λέγων Ἄνθρωπος
ἄνθρωπος, ὃς ἐὰν
γένηται ἀκάθαρτος
ἐπὶ ψυχῇ ἀνθρώπου
ἢ ἐν ὁδῷ μακρὰν
ὑμῖν ἢ ἐν ταῖς
γενεαῖς ὑμῶν,
καὶ ποιήσει τὸ
πασχα κυρίῳ·
Note: Jesus let "unclean" Judas eat their Passover communion -- remember that is says (of Judas): "he who dips his bread with me has lifted up his heal against me"
Goal: don’t take communion for the worse!
Recognize each other.
Friday, January 13th 2023
_8:10am
FriTrust
What level/degree of trusting each other is requisite for taking Communion together?
I know in an extreme case, it seems that a person can still take Communion even if they don't trust Judas.
What if there was a situation where person A didn't trust person B, and person B didn't trust person C, and person D didn't trust person C, etc...What degree, or type of trust needs to exist for Communion to be lawful?
AlFri_8:13am
What exactly is trust anyway?
I know trust and faith are the same Greek word right? So is trust, in the context in question, being able to believe a person's core integrity? Or being able to "trust" your well being to another? Or being able to expect that another won't hurt you? Etc?
9/17/17
There are lots of philosophies about communion:
There is “open” vs. “closed communion”
Many hippy people want “unverified” communion -- walk off the street and just take their word for it that they are a christian
Others have had such open communions that they even welcomed unbelievers in the name of “getting saved” in their pew.
Early church: had someone standing and watching at the door so that only approved / accepted people could walk in and partake. -- that’s way different than social clubs today…
On the other hand:
Basic but Big principle: Don’t hold back communion until people are excommunicated.
Communion included:
· Israelites in the wilderness – 1Co_10:1-4, etc.
· Consider that the rock “shed its blood” for them, and Jesus, the rock, freely gave His profoundly merciful life-giving/saving “blood” to hard-hearted and sinning Israelites in the wilderness.
· Judas Iscariot -- who was already a demon-loving thief (and Jesus knew he would betray Him & had already started betraying)
As long as people are willing to be a part of the covenant, and as long as there is hope for life, then Jesus has a very open crucifixion.
Joh_13:14-17 EMTV Therefore if I, your Lord and your Teacher, have washed your feet, you also ought to wash one another's feet… 17 If you know these things, blessed are you if you do them.
Yes, the Bible very clearly says to do foot washing,
and there it is very clearly in the context of communion.
Only a heretic would want to abandon this.
Lev_11:32 WEB On whatever any of them falls when they are dead, it shall be unclean; whether it is any vessel of wood, or clothing, or skin, or sack, whatever vessel it is, with which any work is done, it must be put into water, and it shall be unclean until the evening; then it will be clean.
Lev_11:32 LB And on whatsoever one of their dead bodies shall fall it shall be unclean; whatever wooden vessel, or garment, or skin, or sack it may be, every vessel in which work should be done, shall be dipped in water, and shall be unclean till evening; and then it shall be clean.
Lev_11:32 καὶ πᾶν, ἐφ᾿
ὃ ἂν ἐπιπέσῃ ἀπ᾿
αὐτῶν τεθνηκότων
αὐτῶν, ἀκάθαρτον
ἔσται ἀπὸ παντὸς
σκεύους ξυλίνου
ἢ ἱματίου ἢ δέρματος
ἢ σάκκου· πᾶν
σκεῦος, ὃ ἐὰν
ποιηθῇ ἔργον ἐν
αὐτῷ, εἰς ὕδωρ
βαφήσεται καὶ ἀκάθαρτον
ἔσται ἕως ἑσπέρας
καὶ καθαρὸν ἔσται.
Clarify & correct the section
entitled, “who may baptize” -- only Mat_28 proclaimers/perfectly commissioned
truth knowers/teachers
Beyond all of the problems church people always seem
to come up with in managing their own religious baptisms is the fact
that Paul very clearly teaches that baptism is not even worth discussing or
practicing if Jesus’ death instrument (which is the basis of baptism) is made
worthless, empty, and vain by apostate, fleshly preachers and church people!
1Co_1:17 WEB For
Christ [Χριστὸς – anointed
one] sent me [ἀπέστειλέ
– i.e. apostl-ed (lit. made me a stationed away one/ apostle)]
not to *baptize [*
βαπτίζειν – wash by
immersion], but to *preach
the Good News [* εὐαγγελίζεσθαι
– announce a (fig. the) good message/ good announcement]--not
in wisdom of words [σοφίᾳ
λόγου], so that the cross of
Christ [τοῦ
Χριστοῦ – the anointed one]
wouldn't be made void [κενωθῇ
– empty, vain, useless, (worthless)].
If we are reverent and softhearted, we can see from
this that we cannot even really begin to establish anything about “baptism”
until we actually have the real Good Announcement proclaimed in the first
place, and we finally repent and stop sinning!
It is clear from this that most no one in church today even has a right
to discuss baptism or even have a stance on what it means since almost no one
has even ever heard the real Jesus preached! But if we go on about baptism and
still have a worthless Jesus and a perverted “cross” that do not save from sin,
then our dirty baptism will also be polluted and demonic.
Only once we finally preach the real Jesus and take up His real death instrument (cross) can we go on to finely dig in to what the Scriptures proclaim to us about baptism (and this is also the pattern of proclamation which Jesus ordained in Matthew 28, and Peter followed in Acts 2). Although it is very unlikely for most readers, the rest of this sub-point is based on the supposition that you have embraced this good and true proclamation and are ready to respond to what God has commanded about baptism.
Factually speaking, Baptism
(“βαπτίζω” from Greek) means immersing
someone in water, therefore this is what we should be doing. However, I find no
Scripture that would directly invalidate pouring (“πρόσχυσις”),
or sprinkling (“ῥαντίζω”),
and it may be worth considering that this method started early in the church as
an alternative when immersion was not an option (see: Didache 1.379; 80-140
AD). Whenever we baptize, we really baptize, meaning we really immerse
unto repentance in water to wash them from their sins, just as the Scriptures
have clearly commanded. In keeping with very early Church teaching (as far as
we know) the only time we might “sprinkle” or “pour” is if there was no option
to bring a person down into water (i.e. If we cannot lower a person into water,
then we might just “raise the water above the person”).
1Co
The word in the Bible for
baptism is “βαπτίζω” (baptizō) which is derived from a
word meaning “to dip or dye,” as opposed to sprinkling, (“ῥαντίζω” -
rhantízō) and pouring,
(“πρόσχυσις” - próschusis). Baptizo itself also includes the ideas of something being “…fully
wet… [as well as to] wash,” (Strong’s), and examples of this meaning are found in Mar_7:4 and Luk_11:38, where baptizo is typically translated as “wash/ washed” in reference to
washing before a meal.
So the word itself means to “dip” or “dye”
and become “fully wet” in water, and this is a nonnegotiable fact of
Greek. And this is confirmed many times over and over, especially in passages
such as this:
2Ki_5:10 KJV And Elisha sent a messenger unto him,
saying, Go and wash in Jordan seven times, and thy flesh shall come again to
thee, and thou shalt be clean.
2Ki_5:14 KJV Then
went he down, and dipped himself seven times in Jordan, according to the saying
of the man of God: and his flesh came again like unto the flesh of a little
child, and he was clean.
When this was translated into the Greek
Septuagint (the Greek Old Testament, or LXX) it was worded like this:
...and dipped himself seven times in Jordan... (KJV)
...καὶ ἐβαπτίσατο ἐν
τῷ Ιορδάνῃ ἑπτάκι
κατὰ... (LXX)
Here, the correlating word
in Greek is “ἐβαπτίσατο” (“Ebaptisato,” that is, a form of “Baptizo”). Don’t forget that this Greek Old Testament was
translated around 200 years before New Testament times, and was the standard
text being referenced when John first came in the wilderness “Baptizing”
(dunking) people in water. And this makes sense, because John was another
Elijah/Elisha figure (Mat_11:14; Mat_17:11-13) who also charged people to be immersed to
obtain their cleansing (Mat_3:6, Mat_3:10-11; Mar_1:4-5; Luk_3:2).
So it is clear from the
dictionary definition all the way to the actual application of the word baptizo, that this word means to
“immerse [or dip] in water.”
“Father,
Son, and Holy Spirit” (Mat_3:16-17); Mat_28:19; (Also compare Trinity
verses: Gen_1:26; Num_6:24-27; Isa_48:16; 1Co_12:4-4; 2Co_13:14; Eph_2:18; 1Jn_5:70)
Note: in the saying, “baptizing them in the
name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit,” (CAB) the words, “the name,” are singular
in English and in Greek (“τὸ ὄνομα”
not “τα ὄνοματα”).
“In
the name of Jesus” (Joh_3:26); (Joh_4:1-3); Act_2:38; Act_8:12, Act_8:16; Act_10:48; Act_19:4-5; (Act_22:16); 1Co_1:13-16; Also see: Heb_2:12-13
(Psa_22:22); Joh_17:6, Joh_17:11-12, Joh_17:26
There are not many Biblical restrictions as to whom
may baptize, except that they must be actually saved from sin*, and it makes no
sense to say that a person could baptize another person into a faith that they
themselves did not hold. It is evident that the primary people who baptize are
those who are actually making disciples* out of other people (* Joh_4:1-2; Mat_28:19-20
– esp. in Greek; Act_28:19), and naturally, it is noteworthy that the early
Church, out of acknowledgement and respect for the Overseer, was specifically
sure to give him the primary oversight of this ordnance as well whenever possible,
recognizing that he also might delegate it to others. It is also noteworthy
that this was done out of obedience to the the traditions passed down from
the Apostles (which are referenced in 2Ti_2:2;
Phi_4:9; etc.). If they were seeking to obey the oral
tradition of the Apostles which we can see clearly commanded in the Bible, we
should probably pay very close attention to what they did.
Unfortunately most Protestants try to stress a theoretical idea of faith, and most have tried very hard to doctrinally tare baptism away from salvation, as though it were merely a separate, optional, symbolic act of obedience. But baptism is constantly interwoven with salvation and even often equated with it throughout the Bible. Because of these inescapable realities, if we are going to be honest, we must at least hold that Baptism is to be our “alter call” and first step toward following Jesus:
Luk_1:76-77 → Luk_3:3; Act_2:37-38, Act_8:36-38, Act_22:16; 1Co_12:13; Gal_3:26-27; but also consider: Luk_23:32-33, Luk_23:42-43 with Rom_6:3-6; 1Co_12:12-13; Col_2:11-13; Gal_3:26-28; Tit_3:5; (Eph_5:26); 1Pe_3:20-21
WEB Moses brought
Aaron and his sons, and washed them with water.
-- Under Construction --
̌
Isn’t this saying,
“
I used to use this to say that all children instantly go to heaven upon death, and so I see why it can be used that way, but I consider that this addresses ‘a child that receives…’ Not simply ‘a child that is born.’ But this should not pose a BIG problem either way for others who disagree, since I would consider that all babies who die eventually inherit the kingdom of Heaven, only some less fortunate after perishing and hopefully being redeemed at judgment.
The reference that I was trying to
remember was in fact to “Jeroboam” (not Ahab):
11 Him that dieth of Jeroboam in the city shall
the dogs eat; and him that dieth in the field shall the fowls of the air eat:
for the LORD hath spoken it. 12 Arise thou therefore, get thee
to thine own house: and
when thy feet enter into the city, the child shall die. 13 And all Israel shall mourn for
him, and bury him: for he only of Jeroboam shall come to the grave, because in
him there is found some good
thing toward the LORD God of Israel in the house of Jeroboam.
The other option would be that perhaps one may think that the children/infants are ‘receiving’ the kingdom by virtue of the fact that their parents are bringing them to Jesus and so would be saved in this way. Those who consider it this way would say that parents can in some since vicariously ‘save’ their children by their faith, by dedicating them to God, which is not unreasonable given concepts like 1 Cor
Now if we add to this the example of circumcision and understand our (new) covenant to be transferable to our children in the same way, we have also given the basis for Infant Baptism, for Jesus said: ‘
This is the exact sense in which
Cyprian and all the council with him, as well as the Apostolic Constitutions
defends infant baptism, and is similar in essence to some things Irenaeus said.
[Compare “Interesting quote from Irenaeus” below]
Nonetheless, for this passage (Luke
But if I wanted to agree with the
early Church I would have to say He means ‘choose in such a way as those who
can’t even choose but simply receive.’ Because all the early church quotes I’ve
seen so far understand that babies can be “vicariously” saved in this way.
But again in both cases, whether a
son of Jeroboam or a baptized child, they would seem to both eventually make it
in the end. But lest (as the early church would put it) a baby should perish
[while I would specify: perish first and then hopefully be redeemed later], it
seems best to “baptize” babies, in some and every way seeking to commit them to
God’s covenant vicariously imparting as much of God’s favor as possible through
our own faith. In the worst case scenario,
‘we have put water on them’ but in the worst case scenario otherwise ‘we have
let them perish,’ and we can only hope that God will redeem them later, ‘no
thanks to us.’
Should we at some point make a
distinction between receiving the Kingdom of Heaven, and going to heaven
temporarily while waiting for Judgment?
If we say that unholy children do
not go to heaven, this is not the same as saying that unholy children, who died
in unwilling unholiness, will not inherit
the Kingdom of Heaven.
The main question is at what point
do relatively innocent, yet unholy, children find redemption?
There is no redemption in death,
but only in life, and resurrection, and the vindication of the righteous
Judgment of God.
In the light of God’s long-awaited
Justice, there is life, and reward, and happiness, and redemption, and even
salvation.
12/15/14; 2/21/17
(recompiled)
One silly Bible hater tried to disprove Act_2:38 (εἰς ἄφεσιν ἁμαρτιῶν) by focusing on the word "for" in English, and referenced a very unusual English usage in Luk_5:14 (περὶ τοῦ καθαρισμοῦ) to out-wit what Acts clearly says. But they are different words!
http://www.biblebelievers.com/jmelton/acts2.html
12/15/14
_
the unbiblical washings that do not wash or save you
from sin
Since modern societies have never heard the real
Good Announcement (the one in the Bible) it is futile, vain, worthless, and
even fool-hearty to go on talking about our various opinions about baptism. The
Jesus we have preached in modern societies is evil, and our filthy
Due to the real truth like this
(which no one actually believes anymore) I have to insist
~2001-2004; 7/22/12 (partly revised and formatted
It should first be made absolutely clear that the Bible does not hold to the doctrine known as “Baptismal Regeneration”. This doctrine in its extreme disobeys Acts 10 and says that people are not saved until they are baptized, and if they die on the way to immersion then they would go to Hell. The Bible condemns Bible disobedience, so obviously this is not true. Despite this, the Bible very clearly teaches that clean, righteous baptism saves.
-- Under Construction --
Whenever we may have more help,
hopefully we can include much more here.
Num8:7
Num8:7
Num8:7
Josiahs Scott, Josiahs@trueconnection.org, www.TrueConnection.org
Recompiled: 6/24/10; Revised: 6/25/10;
7/3/10; 4/26/11; 1/20/12; 2017
Personal, Shorthand Notes
I am covering issues
here that are not normally addressed or debated by the majority of churches,
but I have found the need to address these things because smaller restoration
type people have proposed them
These are unpublished personal notes for our community.
Like usual, in cases like this, you should contact us so that we can teach you all of these exciting and helpful things.
Important
Explanation
These are personal notes that I compiled to confront some heretics that were gloating and glorying in filthy flesh for salvation. These many intricate details actually require a lot of explanation, especially for the uninformed. – please contact me if you would like to learn and understand these notes!
-- Under Construction --
-- Under Construction --
; Vol. 1, Ante-Nicene Fathers, in e-Sword
at 1.08.08)
-- Under Construction --
-- Under Construction --
How many times do we do this???
-- Under Construction --
-- Under Construction --
-- Under Construction --
-- Under Construction --
-- Under Construction --
-- Under Construction --
-- Under Construction --
Mar_7:1-5; Luk_11:38;
-- Under Construction --
-- Under Construction --
ἐ
ἐ
[This English version is much more accurate than others that insert the word “the” into the midst where it is not in the Greek]
ἄ
-- Under Construction --
I think he must have spoken Latin
-- Under Construction --
-- Under Construction --
Disunity of churchianity
-- Under Construction --
Preview
Overview of Perfect Unity
Disciples Commanded To Have The Same Heart Soul
TSK: of the:
Rom_15:5, Rom_6:2, 2Ch_30:12, Jer_32:39, Act_4:32, 1Co_1:10, Phi_1:27, Phi_2:2,
Phi_2:3, Phi_3:16, Phi_4:2, 1Pe_3:8
Mind: Psa_131:1,
Psa_131:2, Jer_45:5, Mat_18:1-4, Mat_20:21-28, Luk_4:6-11, Luk_22:24-27, 1Pe_5:3,
3Jo_1:9, Rev_13:7, Rev_13:8
\/
2Ch_30:10-12 – one heart to obey neglected Passover under Hezekiah
Jer_32:38-39 – Unity for God-fear and good (blessing)
[last 2 references incl. children being blessed]
Act_4:32 – multitude of one heart and one soul
Rom_15:5 – same mind
Phi_1:27 – stand in one spirit & soul
Phi_2:1-3 – cheerful same mind, Love, together-soul in the mind
Phi_3:16 – 'marching' to the same mind and cannon
Phi_4:2 – Euodia Syntyche exhorted to same mind
1Pe_3:8 – all do together-likeness-mindedness together passionately-hurting warm liking as brothers good bowels, A: pressed down / B: warm liking minded
2Co_7:3 – living and dying together
.. plenty of horizontal justice...
2Co_7:6-7, 2Co_7:13 – Paul comforted by Titus & Titus by Corinthians
>> same 2Co_7:1
>>TSK
1Co_1:10 – speak the same thing
...τὸ αὐτὸ
λέγητε
πάντες, καὶ
μὴ ᾖ ἐν ὑμῖν
σχίσματα, ἦτε
δὲ
κατηρτισμένοι
ἐν τῷ αὐτῷ
νοῒ καὶ ἐν τῇ
αὐτῇ γνώμῃ.
1Co_2:11 – who knows the things of man except the spirit of man
τίς γὰρ οἶδεν
ἀνθρώπων τὰ
τοῦ ἀνθρώπου
εἰ μὴ τὸ
πνεῦμα τοῦ ἀνθρώπου
τὸ ἐν αὐτῷ...
>>
1Co_4: – don't judge hidden motives
>>
1Co_8: – puffing knowledge
Rom_12:1 – This is your logical service…
τὴν λογικὴν
λατρείαν ὑμῶν
Rom_12:3-16 – serve each other
Rom_12:16 be
of the same minding into
one another
τὸ αὐτὸ εἰς
ἀλλήλους
φρονοῦντες
Rom_12:18
“If possible—so far
as in you—with all men being in peace” (LSV )
μετὰ πάντων
ἀνθρώπων εἰρηνεύοντες
Rom_15:5 Now may the God of patience and of encouragement grant you to be like-minded among one another, according to Christ Jesus,
Rom_15:5
ὁ δὲ Θεὸς
τῆς ὑπομονῆς
καὶ
παρακλήσεως
δῴη ὑμῖν
τὸ αὐτὸ
φρονεῖν ἐν ἀλλήλοις
κατὰ Χριστὸν
᾿Ιησοῦν,
Heb_12:14-17 * – Pursue peace & holiness WITH all men
Εἰρήνην
διώκετε μετὰ
πάντων...
2Ti_2:22 – Pursue righteousness, faith, love, peace, WITH those calling upon...
...δίωκε δὲ
δικαιοσύνην,
πίστιν, ἀγάπην,
εἰρήνην μετὰ
τῶν ἐπικαλουμένων
τὸν Κύριον ἐκ
καθαρᾶς
καρδίας
Jam_3:17-18 – Make & Sow Peace
καρπὸς δὲ τῆς
δικαιοσύνης ἐν
εἰρήνῃ
σπείρεται τοῖς
ποιοῦσιν εἰρήνην
Eph_4:1-8 – Walk in Humility & Unity;
Eph_4:3 – keep the unity of the Spirit
σπουδάζοντες
τηρεῖν τὴν ἑνότητα
τοῦ
Πνεύματος ἐν
τῷ συνδέσμῳ
τῆς εἰρήνης
Col_3:13-17, etc. – upon all: Love...the together bond of the perfection (with Disciples)
ἐπὶ πᾶσι
δὲ τούτοις
τὴν ἀγάπην, ἥτις
ἐστὶ
σύνδεσμος τῆς
τελειότητος
1Co_14:1 – Pursue the Love
Διώκετε
τὴν ἀγάπην
(serving others: 1Co_14:2-40)
Remember: 2Ti_2:22
* TSK-Summarized: Gen_13:7-9 (Abraham & Lot Division), Psa_34:14 (seek peace), Psa_38:20 (they slander instead), Psa_120:6 (MT: Land with no peace), Psa_133:1 (brothers living in unity), Pro_15:1 (soft/submissive answer turns away wrath), Pro_16:7 (peace w enemies), Pro_17:14 (avoid strife), Isa_11:6-9 (animals made peaceful), Mat_5:9 (peacemakers), Mar_9:50 (salty peace with one another), Rom_12:18 (peace if possible – seen above), Rom_14:19 (chase/pursue peaceful things), 1Co_1:10 (seen above), Gal_5:22-23 (fruit of the Spirit...peace), Eph_4:1-8 (seen above), 1Th_5:15 (no nasty/hurt for nasty/hurt [κακὸν ἀντὶ κακοῦ]), 1Ti_6:11 (chase/pursue love meekness), 2Ti_2:22 (pursue WITH... – seen above), Jam_3:17-18 (real peaceful yielding redemptively-merciful wisdom), 1Pe_3:11 (seek & chase peace)
See: LOV >
Perfect-Love.htm#LovingObeyers
Perfect-Love.htm#BelievingPerfectLove
Perfect-Love.htm#PositivityTowardObeyers
Communication at its Best!
See: LOV > Refresh
· Real Faith Needed: You need clean faith that matches your profession, and claim to submission to obedience, and consistently agrees with your first claim to acceptance of the Truth, without hypocritical inconsistency!
· Virtuous Communication: If you have integrity breaches, these risk, challenge, and strain your communication attempts toward each other (2Co_6), so, let your desolation drive you to brokenness and faith toward God and His agents who speak His Words to you!
Preparation for…
· (A) Logical Virtue: the intentional moral quality and hopeful excellence of questions is necessary , and so is…
· (B) desolation-awareness, as well as…
· (C) Horizontal Honesty & Integrity: the logically resulting faith toward all of the light and Truth that is available through each other.
You can diligently Work & look forward to giving each other life, and then…
· (A) the conversation goes better, and
· (B) gives you more energy for living, and
· (C) does not tax the rest of the day (when stepping aside to recharge), and
· (D) is more affordable by all parties involved.
From Taxing to Addiction
We need to be a breath of fresh air for each other!
We need to be the most reliable and consistent source known for refreshing each other and recharging each other’s batteries!
We need to be the unchallenged unique source of encouragement, optimism, and hope for each other in the universe that has no parallel or competition…
We need to believe in each other’s Truest identity so that we’ll have real Love, and so that we make the value which we give to each other so addicting that we can’t stay away from each other!
Bringing morally optimized faith and right-thinking to each other, that doesn’t inconsistently “beg questions” and endanger the basis of the Good Message, not only makes talking together less taxing and more affordable, but also makes it more sustainable, and even dependable and worthy of dependence. You can not only afford it, but you cannot afford to go without it.
Demand More From Yourself
So: learn the moral skill and virtue of serious and responsible question asking!
Demand more faith and action from yourself in proactively producing fruit consistent with accepting the Truth and begging for discipleship and apprehending reciprocation and sharpening from each other (Pro_27:17, as quoted below).
The Point: Doing more work on your end is one of the biggest needs among all of us right now.
There are already far too many “naturally occurring trials” of providence and persecution; we have no need to pile burdens on top of ourselves and others to make the race more bitter than it already is, especially when we owe sweetness to each other as good trees.
That’s what is means to “do more work on your end” -- and STOP making others “beat you” before you’ll acknowledge justice!
…
Jas_3:8 CAB But no man can tame the tongue. It is an unrestrainable evil, full of deadly poison.
Jas_3:8
τὴν δὲ γλῶσσαν
οὐδεὶς
δύναται ἀνθρώπων
δαμάσαι· ἀκατάσχετον
κακόν, μεστὴ
ἰοῦ
θανατηφόρου.
Jas_3:8 την δε
γλωσσαν ουδεις
Aδαμασαι
δυναται
ανθρωπων Aακαταστατον
TSBδαμασαι TSBακατασχετον
κακον μεστη
ιου
θανατηφορου
Jas_3:9 With it we bless our God and Father,
and with it we curse men, who are created according to the likeness of God.
Jas_3:9
ἐν αὐτῇ
εὐλογοῦμεν
τὸν Θεὸ καὶ
πατέρα, καὶ ἐν
αὐτῇ
καταρώμεθα
τοὺς ἀνθρώπους
τοὺς καθ᾿ ὁμοίωσιν
Θεοῦ
γεγονότας·
Jas_3:9 εν αυτη
ευλογουμεν τον
Aκυριον TSBθεον και
πατερα και εν
αυτη
καταρωμεθα
τους ανθρωπους
τους καθ
ομοιωσιν θεου
γεγονοτας
Jas_3:10 Out of the
same mouth come blessings and curses. My brothers, these things ought not to be
so.
Jas_3:10
ἐκ τοῦ αὐτοῦ
στόματος ἐξέρχεται
εὐλογία καὶ
κατάρα. οὐ
χρή, ἀδελφοί
μου, ταῦτα οὕτω
γίνεσθαι.
Jas_3:10 εκ του
αυτου στοματος
εξερχεται
ευλογια και
καταρα ου χρη
αδελφοι μου
ταυτα ουτως
γινεσθαι
Jas_3:11 The spring does not pour forth from the same
opening both the sweet and the bitter water, does it?
Jas_3:11
μήτι ἡ
πηγὴ ἐκ τῆς
αὐτῆς ὀπῆς
βρύει τὸ
γλυκὺ καὶ
τὸ πικρόν;
Jas_3:11 μητι η
πηγη εκ της
αυτης οπης
βρυει το γλυκυ
και το πικρον
Jas_3:12 It is not
possible, my brothers, for a fig tree to make olives, or a vine to make figs, is it? Thus no spring is able to produce both salt and sweet water.
Jas_3:12
μὴ δύναται,
ἀδελφοί μου,
συκῆ ἐλαίας
ποιῆσαι ἢ ἄμπελος
σῦκα; οὕτως
οὐδεμία
πηγὴ ἁλυκὸν
καὶ γλυκὺ
ποιῆσαι ὕδωρ.
Jas_3:12 μη δυναται αδελφοι μου συκη ελαιας ποιησαι η αμπελος συκα Aουτε TSBουτως TSBουδεμια TSBπηγη αλυκον TSBκαι γλυκυ ποιησαι υδωρ
Make A Tree Good
Mat_12:33 CAB "Either make the tree good and its fruit
good, or else make the tree rotten and its fruit rotten; for a tree is known by
its fruit.
Mat_12:33 ῎Η
ποιήσατε τὸ
δένδρον
καλὸν, καὶ
τὸν καρπὸν
αὐτοῦ
καλόν, ἢ
ποιήσατε τὸ
δένδρον
σαπρὸν, καὶ
τὸν καρπὸν
αὐτοῦ
σαπρόν· ἐκ
γὰρ τοῦ
καρποῦ τὸ
δένδρον
γινώσκεται.
If you do this to each other,
then what do you think your relationships are going to look like?
7 Post-Red Sea
Location-Names
Seven
Names of Locations After The Red Sea Exodus
2024?;
4/6/25
(1) Exo_15:22 – Shur (no water)
(2) Exo_15:23 – Mara/Bitter Waters
(3) Exo_15:27 – Elim (12 Springs & 70 [Date?] Palms)
(4) Exo_16:1 – Sin-Wilderness (Quail & Manna)
(5) Exo_17:1 – Rephidim (no water), i.e....
(6) Exo_17:6 – Horeb (Rock Water & Amalek)
[Exo_18 – Jethro & Judges]
(7) Exo_19
– Sinai
[Exo_20 – 10 commandments]
Exo_15:23 WEB When they came to Marah, they couldn't drink
from the waters of Marah, for they were bitter. Therefore its name was called
Marah.
Exo_15:23 LB And they came to Marah, and they could not
drink the water of Marah, for it was bitter; therefore he named the name of
that place, Bitterness.
Exo_15:23
ἦλθον δὲ εἰς
Μερρα καὶ οὐκ ἠδύναντο
πιεῖν ἐκ
Μερρας, πικρὸν
γὰρ ἦν· διὰ τοῦτο
ἐπωνομάσθη τὸ ὄνομα
τοῦ τόπου ἐκείνου
Πικρία.
Exo_15:24 WEB The people murmured against Moses, saying,
"What shall we drink?"
Exo_15:24 And the
people murmured against Moses, saying, “What shall we drink?”
Exo_15:24
καὶ διεγόγγυζεν
ὁ λαὸς ἐπὶ Μωυσῆν
λέγοντες Τί πιόμεθα;
Exo_15:25 WEB Then he cried to Yahweh. Yahweh showed him a
tree, and he threw it into the waters, and the waters were made sweet. There he
made a statute and an ordinance for them, and there he tested them;
Exo_15:25 And Moses
cried to the Lord, and the Lord showed him a tree, and he cast it into the
water, and the water was sweetened. There He established to him ordinances and
judgments, and there He proved him,
Exo_15:25
ἐβόησεν δὲ
Μωυσῆς πρὸς κύριον·
καὶ ἔδειξεν αὐτῷ
κύριος ξύλον,
καὶ ἐνέβαλεν αὐτὸ
εἰς τὸ ὕδωρ, καὶ
ἐγλυκάνθη τὸ ὕδωρ.
ἐκεῖ ἔθετο αὐτῷ
δικαιώματα καὶ
κρίσεις καὶ ἐκεῖ
ἐπείρασεν αὐτὸν
Exo_15:26 WEB and he said, "If you will diligently
listen to the voice of Yahweh your God, and will do that which is right in his
eyes, and will pay attention to his commandments, and keep all his statutes, I
will put none of the diseases on you, which I have put on the Egyptians; for I
am Yahweh who heals you."
Exo_15:26 and said, “If
you will indeed hear the voice of the Lord your God, and do the things pleasing
before Him, and will heed His commands, and keep all His ordinances, no disease
which I have brought upon the Egyptians will I bring upon you, for I am the
Lord your God that heals you.”
Exo_15:26
καὶ εἶπεν Ἐὰν
ἀκοῇ ἀκούσῃς τῆς
φωνῆς κυρίου
τοῦ θεοῦ σου καὶ
τὰ ἀρεστὰ ἐναντίον
αὐτοῦ ποιήσῃς
καὶ ἐνωτίσῃ ταῖς
ἐντολαῖς αὐτοῦ
καὶ φυλάξῃς πάντα
τὰ δικαιώματα
αὐτοῦ, πᾶσαν νόσον,
ἣν ἐπήγαγον τοῖς
Αἰγυπτίοις, οὐκ
ἐπάξω ἐπὶ σέ· ἐγὼ
γάρ εἰμι κύριος
ὁ ἰώμενός σε.
Exo_15:27 WEB They came to Elim, where there were twelve springs
of water, and seventy palm trees: and they encamped there by the waters.
Exo_15:27 And they came
to Elim, where there were twelve fountains of water and seventy stems of palm
trees; and they camped there by the waters.
Exo_15:27 Καὶ ἤλθοσαν
εἰς Αιλιμ, καὶ ἦσαν
ἐκεῖ δώδεκα
πηγαὶ ὑδάτων
καὶ ἑβδομήκοντα
στελέχη φοινίκων·
παρενέβαλον δὲ
ἐκεῖ παρὰ τὰ ὕδατα.
You need to tap into the New Covenant like Moses foreshadowed so that you can be, and become, sweet good trees to each other!
Ecc_4:7 WEB Then I returned and
saw vanity under the sun.
Ecc_4:7 LB So I returned, and
saw vanity under the sun.
Ecc_4:7 Καὶ ἐπέστρεψα
ἐγὼ καὶ εἶδον
ματαιότητα ὑπὸ
τὸν ἥλιον.
Ecc_4:8 WEB There is one who is
alone, and he has neither son nor brother. There is no end to all of his labor,
neither are his eyes satisfied with wealth. For whom then, do I labor, and
deprive my soul of enjoyment? This also is vanity, yes, it is a miserable
business.
Ecc_4:8 There is one alone, and there is not a second; yes, he has
neither son nor brother: yet there is no end to all his labor; neither is his
eye satisfied with wealth. And for whom do I labor, and deprive my soul of
good? This is also vanity, and an evil trouble.
Ecc_4:8 ἔστιν εἷς,
καὶ οὐκ ἔστιν
δεύτερος, καί γε
υἱὸς καὶ ἀδελφὸς
οὐκ ἔστιν αὐτῷ·
καὶ οὐκ ἔστιν
περασμὸς τῷ
παντὶ μόχθῳ αὐτοῦ,
καί γε ὀφθαλμὸς
αὐτοῦ οὐκ ἐμπίπλαται
πλούτου. καὶ τίνι
ἐγὼ μοχθῶ καὶ
στερίσκω τὴν
ψυχήν μου ἀπὸ ἀγαθωσύνης;
καί γε τοῦτο
ματαιότης καὶ
περισπασμὸς
πονηρός ἐστιν.
Ecc_4:9 WEB Two are better than
one, because they have a good reward for their labor.
Ecc_4:9 The Value of a Friend Two are better than one, seeing they have
a good reward for their labor.
Ecc_4:9 ἀγαθοὶ οἱ
δύο ὑπὲρ τὸν ἕνα,
οἷς ἔστιν αὐτοῖς
μισθὸς ἀγαθὸς ἐν
μόχθῳ αὐτῶν·
Ecc_4:10 WEB For if they fall,
the one will lift up his fellow; but woe to him who is alone when he falls, and
doesn't have another to lift him up.
Ecc_4:10 For if they fall, the one will lift up his companion. But woe
to him that is alone when he falls, and there is not a second to lift him up.
Ecc_4:10 ὅτι ἐὰν
πέσωσιν, ὁ εἷς ἐγερεῖ
τὸν μέτοχον αὐτοῦ,
καὶ οὐαὶ αὐτῷ
τῷ ἑνί, ὅταν πέσῃ
καὶ μὴ ᾖ δεύτερος
τοῦ ἐγεῖραι αὐτόν.
Ecc_4:11 WEB Again, if two lie
together, then they have warmth; but how can one keep warm alone?
Ecc_4:11 Again if two should lie together, they also have warmth. But
how shall one be warmed who is alone?
Ecc_4:11 καί γε ἐὰν
κοιμηθῶσιν δύο,
καὶ θέρμη αὐτοῖς·
καὶ ὁ εἷς πῶς
θερμανθῇ;
Ecc_4:12 WEB If a man prevails
against one who is alone, two shall withstand him; and a threefold cord is not
quickly broken.
Ecc_4:12 And if one should prevail against him, the two shall withstand
him; and a threefold cord cannot easily be broken.
Ecc_4:12 καὶ ἐὰν ἐπικραταιωθῇ
ὁ εἷς, οἱ δύο στήσονται
κατέναντι αὐτοῦ,
καὶ τὸ σπαρτίον
τὸ ἔντριτον οὐ
ταχέως ἀπορραγήσεται.
Pro_27:17 NKJV As iron sharpens iron, So a man sharpens the countenance of his friend.
>>>
(A) Open to US; Separate from Worldly Apostates
2Co_6:10 CAB as sorrowful, yet always rejoicing; as poor,
yet making many rich; as having nothing, and yet possessing all things.
2Co_6:10
ὡς
λυπούμενοι ἀεὶ
δὲ
χαίροντες, ὡς
πτωχοὶ
πολλοὺς δὲ
πλουτίζοντες,
ὡς μηδὲν ἔχοντες
καὶ πάντα
κατέχοντες.
2Co_6:11 O
Corinthians! We have spoken openly to you, our heart has been opened wide.
2Co_6:11
Τὸ στόμα ἡμῶν
ἀνέῳγε
πρὸς ὑμᾶς,
Κορίνθιοι, ἡ
καρδία ἡμῶν
πεπλάτυνται·
2Co_6:12 You are not restricted by us, but you are
restricted by your own affections.
2Co_6:12
οὐ
στενοχωρεῖσθε
ἐν ἡμῖν,
στενοχωρεῖσθε
δὲ ἐν τοῖς
σπλάγχνοις ὑμῶν·
2Co_6:13 Now in return
for the same--I speak as to children--you also be opened wide.
2Co_6:13 τὴν δὲ
αὐτὴν ἀντιμισθίαν,
ὡς τέκνοις
λέγω,
πλατύνθητε
καὶ ὑμεῖς.
2Co_6:14 Do not become
unequally yoked with unbelievers; for what participation is there
for righteousness with lawlessness? And what communion is there for light with
darkness?
2Co_6:14
Μὴ γίνεσθε
ἑτεροζυγοῦντες
ἀπίστοις·
τίς γὰρ
μετοχὴ
δικαιοσύνῃ
καὶ ἀνομίᾳ;
τίς δὲ
κοινωνία
φωτὶ πρὸς
σκότος;
2Co_6:14 μη
γινεσθε
ετεροζυγουντες
απιστοις τις γαρ
μετοχη
δικαιοσυνη και
ανομια Aη τις TSBδε
κοινωνια φωτι
προς σκοτος
2Co_6:15 And what
agreement is there for Christ with Belial? Or what part is there for a believer
with an infidel?
2Co_6:15
τίς δὲ
συμφώνησις
Χριστῷ πρὸς
Βελίαλ; ἢ
τίς μερὶς
πιστῷ μετὰ
ἀπίστου;
2Co_6:15 τις δε
συμφωνησις Aχριστου TSBχριστω
προς Sβελιαλ
TBAβελιαρ η
τις μερις
πιστω μετα
απιστου
2Co_6:16 And what
union is there for the temple of God with idols? For you are the temple of the
living God, just as God has said: "I will dwell in them and walk among
them, and I will be their God, and they shall be My people."
2Co_6:16
τίς δὲ
συγκατάθεσις
ναῷ Θεοῦ
μετὰ εἰδώλων;
ὕμεῖς γὰρ
ναὸς Θεοῦ ἐστε
ζῶντος,
καθὼς εἶπεν ὁ
Θεὸς ὅτι ἐνοικήσω
ἐν αὐτοῖς
καὶ ἐμπεριπατήσω,
καὶ ἔσομαι αὐτῶν
Θεός, καὶ αὐτοὶ
ἔσονταί μου
λαός.
2Co_6:16 τις δε
συγκαταθεσις
ναω θεου μετα
ειδωλων Aημεις TSBυμεις γαρ
ναος θεου Aεσμεν TSBεστε
ζωντος καθως
ειπεν ο θεος
οτι ενοικησω
εν αυτοις και
εμπεριπατησω
και εσομαι
αυτων θεος και
αυτοι εσονται Aμου TSBμοι λαος
2Co_6:17 Therefore
"Come out from the midst of them and be separated,"
says the Lord. "Do not touch what is unclean, and I will receive
you."
2Co_6:17
διὸ ἐξέλθατε
ἐκ μέσου αὐτῶν
καὶ ἀφορίσθητε,
λέγει
Κύριος, καὶ ἀκαθάρτου
μὴ ἅπτεσθε, κἀγὼ
εἰσδέξομαι ὑμᾶς,
2Co_6:17 διο Aεξελθατε TSBεξελθετε
εκ μεσου αυτων
και αφορισθητε
λεγει κυριος
και ακαθαρτου
μη απτεσθε
καγω
εισδεξομαι υμας
2Co_6:18 "I will
be a Father to you, and you will be My sons and daughters, says the LORD
Almighty."
2Co_6:18
καὶ ἔσομαι ὑμῖν
εἰς πατέρα,
καὶ ὑμεῖς ἔσεσθέ
μοι εἰς υἱοὺς
καὶ
θυγατέρας,
λέγει Κύριος
παντοκράτωρ.
(B) Receive Us by Cleanness
2Co_7:1
CAB
Therefore [ταύτας
οὖν], having these promises [ἐπαγγελίας],
beloved, let us cleanse [καθαρίσωμεν]
ourselves from all filthiness [μολυσμοῦ]
·of the
flesh [σαρκὸς]
and spirit [πνεύματος],
perfecting [ἐπιτελοῦντες]
holiness ·in the fear of
God [ἐν
φόβῳ Θεοῦ – in God phobia/fear].
2Co_7:1 ταύτας
οὖν ἔχοντες
τὰς
ἐπαγγελίας,
ἀγαπητοί,
καθαρίσωμεν
ἑαυτοὺς
ἀπὸ παντὸς
μολυσμοῦ
σαρκὸς καὶ
πνεύματος,
ἐπιτελοῦντες
ἁγιωσύνην
ἐν φόβῳ Θεοῦ.
2Co_7:2
Receive us in your hearts [i.e.
2Co_6:11-13] [Χωρήσατε
ἡμᾶς – (comp. Gen_13:6 LXX {Abraham & Lot};
Mat_15:17 {food in stomach})]. ·We
have wronged [ἠδικήσαμεν
– i.e. damaged with injustice/unrighteousness] no one [οὐδένα],
·we have
corrupted [ἐφθείραμεν]
no one [οὐδένα],
·we have
defrauded [ἐπλεονεκτήσαμεν]
no one [οὐδένα].
2Co_7:2 Χωρήσατε
ἡμᾶς·
οὐδένα
ἠδικήσαμεν,
οὐδένα ἐφθείραμεν,
οὐδένα
ἐπλεονεκτήσαμεν.
2Co_7:3 I do not speak to condemn you [κατάκρισιν];
for I have said before [προείρηκα]
that you are in our hearts [ὅτι
ἐν ταῖς
καρδίαις
ἡμῶν ἐστε],
so that [εἰς
τὸ] we die together [συναποθανεῖν]
and we live together [συζῆν].
2Co_7:3 TSBοὐ
πρὸς
κατάκρισιν |Aου|
λέγω·
προείρηκα
γὰρ ὅτι ἐν
ταῖς
καρδίαις
ἡμῶν ἐστε
εἰς τὸ συναποθανεῖν
καὶ συζῆν.
2Co_7:4 Great is my confidence toward you,
great is my boasting concerning you. I have been filled with comfort. I am
exceedingly joyful in all our tribulation.
2Co_7:4 πολλή
μοι παρρησία
πρὸς ὑμᾶς,
πολλή μοι
καύχησις
ὑπὲρ ὑμῶν·
πεπλήρωμαι
τῇ παρακλήσει,
ὑπερπερισσεύομαι
τῇ χαρᾷ ἐπὶ
πάσῃ τῇ
θλίψει
ἡμῶν.
/ LLO?
Mar_9:42-47 – Amputate sinning body parts
Mar_9:47 CAB "And if
your eye causes you to stumble, cast it out. It would be better for you to
enter into the kingdom of God with one eye, than having two eyes to be cast into
the fiery hell,
Mar_9:47
καὶ ἐὰν ὁ
ὀφθαλμός σου
σκανδαλίζῃ
σε, ἔκβαλε αὐτόν·
καλόν σοί ἐστι
μονόφθαλμον
εἰσελθεῖν εἰς
τὴν
βασιλείαν τοῦ
Θεοῦ, ἢ δύο ὀφθαλμοὺς
ἔχοντα βληθῆναι
εἰς τὴν
γέενναν τοῦ
πυρός,
Mar_9:47 και εαν ο
οφθαλμος σου
σκανδαλιζη σε
εκβαλε αυτον
καλον Aσε TSBσοι εστιν
μονοφθαλμον
εισελθειν εις
την βασιλειαν
του θεου η δυο
οφθαλμους
εχοντα
βληθηναι εις την
γεενναν TSBτου TSBπυρος
Mar_9:48 where 'Their
worm does not die, and the fire is not quenched.'
Mar_9:48
ὅπου ὁ
σκώληξ αὐτῶν
οὐ τελευτᾷ
καὶ τὸ πῦρ
οὐ
σβέννυται.
Mar_9:48 οπου ο
σκωληξ αυτων
ου τελευτα και
το πυρ ου
σβεννυται
Mar_9:49 "For everyone will be salted with fire,
and every sacrifice will be seasoned with salt.
Mar_9:49
πᾶς γὰρ πυρὶ
ἁλισθήσεται,
καὶ πᾶσα
θυσία ἁλὶ ἁλισθήσεται.
Mar_9:49 πας γαρ
πυρι TSBαλισθησεται
TSBκαι TSBπασα TSBθυσια TSBαλι
αλισθησεται
Mar_9:50 Salt is good,
but if the salt becomes unsalty, by what will you season it? Have salt in
yourselves, and be at peace with one another."
Mar_9:50
Καλὸν τὸ ἅλας·
ἐὰν δὲ τὸ ἅλας
ἄναλον
γένηται, ἐν
τίνι αὐτὸ ἀρτύσετε;
ἔχετε ἐν ἑαυτοῖς
ἅλας καὶ εἰρηνεύετε
ἐν ἀλλήλοις.
Mar_9:50 καλον το
αλας εαν δε το
αλας αναλον
γενηται εν
τινι αυτο
αρτυσετε εχετε
εν εαυτοις Aαλα TSBαλας και
ειρηνευετε εν
αλληλοις
Heb_10:22 CAB let us approach with a true heart in full
assurance of faith, having our hearts sprinkled from an evil conscience, and
our bodies having been washed with clean water.
Heb_10:22
προσερχώμεθα
μετὰ ἀληθινῆς
καρδίας ἐν
πληροφορίᾳ
πίστεως, ἐρραντισμένοι
τὰς καρδίας
ἀπὸ
συνειδήσεως
πονηρᾶς καὶ
λελουσμένοι
τὸ σῶμα ὕδατι
καθαρῷ·
Heb_10:22
προσερχωμεθα
μετα αληθινης
καρδιας εν πληροφορια
πιστεως Aρεραντισμενοι
TSBερραντισμενοι
τας καρδιας
απο
συνειδησεως
πονηρας και Aλελουσμενοι
TSBλελουμενοι
το σωμα υδατι
καθαρω
Heb_10:23 Let us hold
fast the confession of our hope without wavering, for He who promised is
faithful.
Heb_10:23
κατέχωμεν
τὴν ὁμολογίαν
τῆς ἐλπίδος
ἀκλινῆ·
πιστὸς γὰρ ὁ
ἐπαγγειλάμενος·
Heb_10:23
κατεχωμεν
την ομολογιαν
της ελπιδος
ακλινη πιστος
γαρ ο
επαγγειλαμενος
Heb_10:24 And let us consider one another for the
stirring up of love and of good works,
Heb_10:24
καὶ κατανοῶμεν
ἀλλήλους εἰς
παροξυσμὸν ἀγάπης
καὶ καλῶν ἔργων,
Heb_10:24 και
κατανοωμεν
αλληλους εις
παροξυσμον αγαπης
και καλων
εργων
Heb_10:25 not forsaking
the assembling of ourselves, just as is the custom for some, but exhorting one another, and all the more as you see the Day
drawing near.
Heb_10:25 μὴ ἐγκαταλείποντες
τὴν ἐπισυναγωγὴν
ἑαυτῶν,
καθὼς ἔθος
τισίν, ἀλλὰ
παρακαλοῦντες,
καὶ τοσούτῳ
μᾶλλον, ὅσῳ
βλέπετε ἐγγίζουσαν
τὴν ἡμέραν.
We Need each other in this dark and desolate age!
Are you ready to help write The Book of Remembrance?
Something supernatural could be noticed in heaven from our interactions,
if we just get reverent to the Truth!
Mal_3:13 WEB "Your words have been stout against
me," says Yahweh. "Yet you say, 'What have we spoken against you?'
Mal_3:13 LB “You have spoken grievous words against Me,”
says the Lord. “Yet you said, ‘In what way have we spoken against You?’
Mal_3:13
Ἐβαρύνατε ἐπ᾿
ἐμὲ τοὺς λόγους
ὑμῶν, λέγει κύριος,
καὶ εἴπατε Ἐν τίνι
κατελαλήσαμεν
κατὰ σοῦ;
Mal_3:14 WEB You have said, 'It is vain to serve God;' and
'What profit is it that we have followed his instructions, and that we have
walked mournfully before Yahweh of Armies?
Mal_3:14 You said, ‘He
that serves God labors in vain: and what have we gained in that we have kept
His ordinances, and in that we have walked as suppliants before the face of the
Lord Almighty?
Mal_3:14
εἴπατε Μάταιος
ὁ δουλεύων θεῷ,
καὶ τί πλέον ὅτι
ἐφυλάξαμεν τὰ
φυλάγματα αὐτοῦ
καὶ διότι ἐπορεύθημεν
ἱκέται πρὸ
προσώπου κυρίου
παντοκράτορος;
Mal_3:15 WEB Now we call the proud happy; yes, those who
work wickedness are built up; yes, they tempt God, and escape.'
Mal_3:15 And now we
pronounce strangers blessed; and all they who act unlawfully are built up; and
they have resisted God, and yet have been delivered.’”
Mal_3:15
καὶ νῦν ἡμεῖς
μακαρίζομεν ἀλλοτρίους,
καὶ ἀνοικοδομοῦνται
πάντες ποιοῦντες
ἄνομα καὶ ἀντέστησαν
θεῷ καὶ ἐσώθησαν.
Mal_3:16 WEB Then those who feared Yahweh spoke one with
another; and Yahweh listened, and heard, and a book of memory was written
before him, for those who feared Yahweh, and who honored his name.
Mal_3:16 The People
Complain Harshly Thus they spoke, those that feared the Lord, everyone to his
neighbor: and the Lord gave heed, and listened, and He wrote a book of
remembrance before him for them that feared the Lord and reverenced His name.
Mal_3:16
Ταῦτα κατελάλησαν
οἱ φοβούμενοι
τὸν κύριον, ἕκαστος
πρὸς τὸν πλησίον
αὐτοῦ· καὶ
προσέσχεν κύριος
καὶ εἰσήκουσεν
καὶ ἔγραψεν
βιβλίον
μνημοσύνου ἐνώπιον
αὐτοῦ τοῖς
φοβουμένοις τὸν
κύριον καὶ εὐλαβουμένοις
τὸ ὄνομα αὐτοῦ.
Mal_3:17 WEB They shall be mine," says Yahweh of
Armies, "my own possession in the day that I make, and I will spare them,
as a man spares his own son who serves him.
Mal_3:17 “And they
shall be Mine,” says the Lord Almighty, “in the day which I appoint for a
peculiar possession; and I will make choice of them, as a man makes choice of
his son that serves him.
Mal_3:17
καὶ ἔσονταί
μοι, λέγει κύριος
παντοκράτωρ, εἰς
ἡμέραν, ἣν ἐγὼ
ποιῶ εἰς
περιποίησιν,
καὶ αἱρετιῶ αὐτοὺς
ὃν τρόπον αἱρετίζει
ἄνθρωπος τὸν υἱὸν
αὐτοῦ τὸν
δουλεύοντα αὐτῷ.
Mal_3:18 WEB Then you shall return and discern between the
righteous and the wicked, between him who serves God and him who doesn't serve
him.
Mal_3:18 Then shall
you return, and discern between the righteous and the wicked, and between him
that serves God, and him that does not serve Him.
Mal_3:18 καὶ ἐπιστραφήσεσθε
καὶ ὄψεσθε ἀνὰ
μέσον δικαίου
καὶ ἀνὰ μέσον ἀνόμου
καὶ ἀνὰ μέσον
τοῦ δουλεύοντος
θεῷ καὶ τοῦ μὴ
δουλεύοντος.
2/16/25; 4/6/25 (recompiled)
2/16/25
A 8:45 AM
QNA
Communication
Can you give us practical applications on how we can make our communications among us more efficient?
I ask because I've had a number of lengthy dialogues between different ones of us recently. On one hand I do value tooling thru things among us; at the same time there are potentially a lot more topics and discussions to go thru, and I don't think any of us has the lifespan to cover everything that could be discussed, at least not at the pace we're going and with the approaches we have had towards each other.
Any practical ideas that would help us make our discussions more efficient and successful?
I know if we generally "think right" and if we also make sure to oppose ourselves being fleshly then that would make us more successful. I would think that if it were so easy to catch ourselves thinking wrongly and to correct ourselves to think right then we wouldn't need repeated help & exhortations to think right.
Could you give us more targeted applications for how to communicate successfully? Any step by step, outlined protocols that we could follow?
(edited)
2/16/25; 4/6/25
There's a certain amount of randomness and chaos that is derived from the universe which means to be conquered and tamed.
Some chaos is avoidable by discipline and rationality so that the troubles of the universe can be mitigated by the virtue of a speaker, whereas other chaos is a constant competition against the best people including Jesus Himself who rolled with the punches and always turn chaos into solutions.
Much more concerning then the chaos in the universe, is that there's a certain amount of chaos and disorder in our brains and our souls that needs to be conquered.
The disciplines of writing and preparing structure can help conquer and overcome certain amounts of chaos both in the universe as well as in our souls.
The more you write the more you can bang your brain into the right shape of logic that it was designed to function in which drastically and dramatically changes the way you think and communicate in a way that promotes more order and fights and pushes toward more profitable results when communicating and attempting to help others understand what you're attempting to say and conquering the confusion of chaos in the universe and in each other's souls.
Understand the Use of Contrast
Contrast is a verbal thematic mechanism which is essential for logical communication.
Understand other people’s contrast more than, and instead of, trying to pull everything back to your previous point.
Each person talking needs to take turns making contrasting points and every response needs to attempt to address the point of the other person’s contrast in an orderly way
Stop preferring less mature ways of thinking and reaping miscommunication as a result
Gigantic Need:
The proper use of a woman’s “circular thinking”!
2/16/25
Deescalate and stop being flustered, and stop doing things that fluster others! -- this is vanity because you’re creating hairballs that creates work for others to untangle instead of providing solutions for others like humans have been commanded to do!
When you’re close to a solution don’t go backward and deepen the wound -- it is usually not worth it
Go from “wound care” to “healing”, and if you can’t think sequentially, many times it is better to wait until another conversation.
Think: taboo violations, premature cans of worms, saying things out of context (without sufficiently informing and/or reminding the listeners),
This is where the principle applies:
Whoever is most offended is the one who is most wrong.
A 9:00 AM
QnA:
2/16/25
I know we all oppose such notions, at least on paper, but there have been a number of situations that have happened among us where it can feel like we are not far from believing that doctrine in practice. How can we fight to live consistently with the truth that we can in fact agree on everything? How can we be hopeful, and live in a hopeful posture, and not cave to giving up, that all our interactions and discussions can have a good resolve to them?
(edited)
A 9:14 AM
QnA
2/16/25
I know among us we have different life setups, and schedules, and responsibilities, and such. And even among us locally we can have different needs to meet. So pausing for questionable decisions and making sure another righteous person is on the same page with you might not often be feasible. How do you know when to prioritize another's concerns (if they do voice them) over your desire to move forward, and keep going, and proceed with life according to the best of your judgement call?
Josiahs Scott, Josiahs@trueconnection.org, www.TrueConnection.org
5/26/08; 8/25/09; 9/11/09
Other dates -- recompiled between several Bible
studies (incl. Repent of your Perception)
-- Under Construction --
1Th_2:18-20
1Th_3:8
2Co_1:14
Phi_4:1
Rom_1:11-12
- we are all in this together, and love doing things for each other’s good
-- Under Construction --
btc, etc.
who we are
The
only reason I put this here is to avoid people misusing this work with bad motives.
This is officially copyrighted to protect it from those with money in mind, and
to preserve it for free distribution, especially in the unlikely event that
someone might think to make money off of it rather than maximizing its
distribution. You are permitted and encouraged to freely copy and
redistribute this work in its entirety, via standard copy machine or electronic
documentation as long as you make no money off of it. If you wish to reproduce
this work on any larger scale, please contact me at Josiahs@trueconnection.org. You may
also quote this document, by citing the reference as:
“[Name
of Bible Study]” By Josiahs Scott, www.TrueConnection.org
2co8:19 -- travel companions are
bound together to stay together and not abandon the mission
>Tsk
slips that do not disqualify leadership
David's one time sexual and murderous fall...?
David took a census, and was punished
Jesus sent the apostles out to preach before they had been completely refined, and tried with every trial and every season.
Jesus said, Peter Satan seeks to sift you
all the apostles denied Jesus at the Garden of Gethsemane
Peter was later rebuked by Paul
the New Testament requires that leaders be unimpeachable
>> review 1st Timothy 3, 5, Titus, and other places
Paul said, not that I have been made perfect but that I press on...
unimpeachable does not seem to mean that they have never fallen but that they don't continue in sin
even if they still need to be made perfect with Paul, and they still need to pass the test of being courageous to be a martyr like the rest of the Apostles were at first, it does not seem like this disqualifies them from going out and preaching the truth they already currently have, and preaching as they have been commissioned
Apollos did not have all the needed information, but he did have some truth, and he was praised for what he preached in a blameless way with limited knowledge
…
6/27/17
proclamation is not a round table small group discussion.
Paul wanted to proclaim the good announcement at the assembly
at Rome.
there is a time for prophesying, there is a time for teaching, there is
a time for discussion and questions, there is a time for proclamation.
...
nor are you allowed to despise the potential righteousness of one man
being the only one speaking.
as Moses, Ezra, etc. did.
what if the one person who is speaking is the only one in the room who
is right and the rest are wrong?
what if the one speaking is the only one who has been filled with the
one spirit who is holy and the rest are sitting by wishing and waiting that
they also would be filled?
if a truth proclaimer proclaims in these desolate days, this is actually
the most likely scenario!
don't start with this foolishness and demonic mindlessness of Kora's
rebellion, saying, we are all holy here, and we are all filled with a spirit
and where should all be speaking.
only when they are all filled do the others at Cornelius is house start
speaking as
flash balls will prop themselves up and brag against people more eager
and true than themselves based on external circumstances and fleshly novelties
and preferences rather than the truth of saltiness and fiery proclamation.
one flesh ball prefers one flavor of sin, and another prefers another
flavor of vanity and foolishness and sin, and each one uses this as leverage to
prop themselves up against those who are more righteous and worthy than
themselves.
when you have a congregation of sickos and perverts it does no good to
stop the focus from being on the sinful pastor and put it on the sinful and
worthless, ignorant people.
the problem has nothing to do with the circumstances in which evil
people preach, but with the content of evil that they preach from.
....
10/10/17
I can speak as one who is very rustic and hardcore and basic
when I first heard the truth, we were sitting on the floor in a portable
the vast majority of my teaching and preaching has been without a platform
I know very well how pastors have become professional platform performers (and even puppets) packing up points with the popularity of the people.
Elliott Nesch
“One of the very earliest epistles we have outside the NT is Clement's epistle to the Corinthians. He says:
The apostles have preached the Gospel to us from the Lord Jesus Christ; Jesus Christ [has done so] from God. Christ therefore was sent forth by God, and the apostles by Christ. Both these appointments, then, were made in an orderly way, according to the will of God. Having therefore received their orders, and being fully assured by the resurrection of our Lord Jesus Christ, and established in the word of God, with full assurance of the Holy Ghost, they went forth proclaiming that the kingdom of God was at hand. And thus preaching through countries and cities, they appointed the first-fruits [of their labours], having first proved them by the Spirit, to be bishops and deacons of those who should afterwards believe. Nor was this any new thing, since indeed many ages before it was written concerning bishops and deacons. For thus saith the Scripture in a certain place, “I will appoint their bishops in righteousness, and their deacons in faith.” Clement of Rome (AD 30-100), 1.16
Notice "bishops and deacons." This plurality of leaders is the NT model of Church leadership (See Philippians_1:1). Next Clement says:
"Our apostles also knew, through our Lord Jesus Christ, and there would be strife on account of the office of the episcopate. For this reason, therefore, inasmuch as they had obtained a perfect fore-knowledge of this, they appointed those [ministers] already mentioned, and afterwards gave instructions, that when these should fall asleep, other approved men should succeed them in their ministry. We are of opinion, therefore, that those appointed by them, or afterwards by other eminent men, with the consent of the whole Church, and who have blamelessly served the flock of Christ in a humble, peaceable, and disinterested spirit, and have for a long time possessed the good opinion of all, cannot be justly dismissed from the ministry. For our sin will not be small, if we eject from the episcopate those who have blamelessly and holily fulfilled its duties. Blessed are those presbyters who, having finished their course before now, have obtained a fruitful and perfect departure [from this world]; for they have no fear lest any one deprive them of the place now appointed them. But we see that ye have removed some men of excellent behaviour from the ministry, which they fulfilled blamelessly and with honour" (Clement of Rome (AD 30-100), 1.17).
If ever there were a time to rebuke the church for breaking sacramental succession, it would be here. But this was not Clement's criticism, even though these Corinthians had removed some men from leadership and elected others. Nowhere does Clement even bring up apostolic succession as it is taught today. Nor does he say that the Eucharist was now void. On the contrary, the qualifications for leadership is godliness. He mentions above that while the apostles did appoint these ministers, however, other "eminent men" could appoint ministers over the flock.”
--
Ireneous
“It is possible, then, for
everyone in every Church, who may wish to know the truth, to contemplate the
tradition of the Apostles which has been made known throughout the whole world.
And we are in a position to enumerate those who were instituted bishops by the
Apostles, and their successors to our own times: men who neither knew nor
taught anything like these heretics rave about. For if the Apostles had known
hidden mysteries which they taught to the elite secretly and apart from the
rest, they would have handed them down especially to those very ones to whom
they were committing the self-same Churches. For surely they wished all those
and their successors to be perfect and without reproach, to whom they handed on
their authority (Against Heresies_3:3:1 [A.D. 189]).
It is necessary to obey those who are the presbyters
in the Church, those who, as we have shown, have succession from the Apostles;
those who have received, with the succession of the episcopate, the sure
charism of truth according to the good pleasure of the Father. But the rest,
who have no part in the primitive succession and assemble wheresoever they
will, must be held in suspicion (ibid_4:26:2).”
--
5:10 (EMTV-Based)